Red flag gun laws: Gun-rights advocates say they’ll lead to confiscations from law-abiding people

Red flag gun laws: Gun-rights advocates say they’ll lead to confiscations from law-abiding people

Articles, Blog , , , , , , , , , , 32 Comments


MORE ON THE RED FLAG LAW AND WHY PEOPLE ARE AGAINST THEM. >>Reporter: GUN OWNERS SAY THAT THE RED FLAG LAW IS A VIOLATION ON THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. >>THERE’S EVIL IN THEHEARTED OF MAN HE’S GOING TO EXPSS IT AND NO LAW IS GOING TO STOP THAT. >>Reporter: SHE SAYS SHE IS SICK AND TIRED OF LAWMAKERS AND GUN REFORM ADVOCATES GOING AFTER HER SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT. >>IT MAKES ME ANGRY. IT’S NOT FAIR. >>Reporter: HER CONCERNS HAVE RAMPED UP AFTER NEW CALLS FOR GUN CONTROL FOLLOWING THE MASSACRES IN EL PASO AND DAYTON. >>CERTAIN SEGMENT OF SOCIETY ARE OPERATING FROM A PLACE OF FEAR AND IGNORANCE ABOUT. THAT’S JUST ONE TOOL OF MANY THAT CAN BE USED TO HARM OTHERS. >>Reporter: NC HOUSE BILL 1054 ALSO KNOWN AS THE RED FLAG LAW WOULD EMPOWER PEOPLE TO PETITION A JUDGE TO TEMPORARILY REMOVE A LAW FROM SOMEONE SHOWING SUICIDAL OR THREATENING BEHAVIOR. PRESIDENT TRUMP AGREES WITH THE LAW WHICH IS LEGAL IN 15 STATES AND WASHINGTON, D.C. GUN CONTROL ADVOCATES IN OUR STATE SAY MORE BACKGROUND CHECKS ARE NEEDED AND RED FLAG LAW IS A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. >>WE HAVE A RESPONSIBILITY TO KEEP OUR KIDS SAFE. >>Reporter: MARSHA MOORE INTRODUCED RED FLAG LAW IT STALLED IN COMMITTEE. THIS WEEK SHE’S FIGHTING TO BRING IT TO THE HOUSE FLOOR. >>DO YOU THINK YOU CAN GET THE VOTES? >>I THINK A DISCHARGE PETITION BRINGING THE ABILITY TO DEBATE THIS BILL, NO MATTER WHAT THE VOTE IS AT THE END, PEOPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAVE THIS BILL HEARD, FULLY DEBATED AND VOTE UP OR DOWN. >>Reporter: GUN OWNERS ARE CONCERNED THAT RED FLAG LAWS WOULD LEAD TO ABUSE, THEY WORRY THAT GUN OWNERS WOULD BE LABELED AS A THREAT JUST TO TAKE THEIR GUNS. WE’LL KEEP YOU UPDATED IF THE BILL

32 thoughts on “Red flag gun laws: Gun-rights advocates say they’ll lead to confiscations from law-abiding people

  • Sister Grimm Post author

    I hope they confiscate every gun that can be used to kill groups of people at a time.

  • Boo Ya Post author

    People in favor this law are ignorant of history

  • Josie Whales Post author

    Unconstitutional….Shall not be infringed says it all

  • Blue Chains Post author

    Let red flag gun laws pass. Our boogaloo is near

  • The Dark Jedi Post author

    I'm not against ALL of the provisions listed below, but my question is where do we draw the line? How long do we let the government boil the frog before we realize our 2nd amendment is dead?

    1934: National Firearms Act requires permit and tax on suppressors.
    1939: Supreme court ruling that short barreled shotguns should be heavily regulated.
    1968: Gun control act bans importation of any gun deemed "unsuitable for sporting purposes."
    1975: Firearms Control Regulations Act bans all semi-automatic guns in Washington D.C.
    1986: The Firearm Owners Protection Act bans private ownership of any fully automatic weapon made after 1986.
    1994-2004: Federal Assault Weapons Ban
    2019: Bump stock ban
    Also 2019: Red Flag laws
    …
    …
    2076: America celebrates it's tricentennial by repealing the 2nd Amendment?

  • DasEichenlaub Post author

    That's the truth. And the arrest of a lot of minorities, but Democrats love a good excuse to call racism, they love them so much they don't mind providing them

  • Mystery Monk Post author

    How do I help pay for bullet's?

  • novemberain Post author

    Come and just try and take it libtards!!

  • Ben Dover Post author

    Every single time…they will take guns from law abiding citizens or they are taking away my rights. For starters, nobody is taking your rights away, it should be a privilege but that's another topic. To remove the 2nd Amendment it would need legislation that would never happen. If your mentaly unstable why should anyone consider giving you a gun let alone have one? There is no one solid reason anyone can give to defend that. Law abiding citizens follow the law therefore aren't effected. There's laws for stealing, murder, drunk driving but I guess those effect the law abiding citizen so maybe just do away with laws.

  • Cheryl Post author

    We don't need gun laws, we need them to stop the false flags. Turning the entire country into Chicago is not the answer. And don't start with the "nobody is seizing guns" because we all know, give them an inch and they take a mile. These were even predicted false flags, Q did 24 hour notice and Alex Jones said "Expect them to pull something", just the day before.

  • Steve Farris Post author

    I am a gun owner. Six of them, heavy caliber and plinker hand guns, shotguns, semiautomatic home defense weapon(what the antigun people call an assault weapon) and two hunting rifles. I believe the red flag laws as Graham described could stop some really mentally ill people from using a gun to harm themselves or kill other people. The key is getting a Judge to have a hearing before sending the police to temporarily remove the weapons. If the police came to collect mine I would want to see a warrant. I respect our judicial system and would certainly comply and argue my case in the courtroom, not with a police officer. But, and here is the rub, don't piss off your ex-wife or girlfriend. Don't mess with your buddies wife. Don't tick off your mother-in-law., and if the police do come give it up, there are a lot more of them and they go to the gun range more often than you.

  • Roland Carver Post author

    Mass Shootings are fewer than car wrecks. Excuses to disarm public.

  • BIG HUNGRY Post author

    Sorry Ben Franklin. We failed to keep the Republic. We sacrifice our liberties/ freedoms for a false sense of security. …goodbye Republic.

  • Private Post author

    Unconstitutional….

  • Frondaro Delarge Post author

    all gun laws are infringements

  • Azntrutek2012 Post author

    Civil war.

  • Legolas Greenleaf Post author

    Benjamin Franklin once
    said: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
    temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Another oppressive
    intrusion by the bureaucracy into the Rights of Americans will do nothing to
    stop a determined criminal nut-case from wreaking havoc. All that more
    oppression of our Constitutional Rights will do, is to show the Deep State that
    if they want to further usurp our freedom all the Deep State needs to do is
    stage more False Flags. Red (False) Flag laws are not the answer, think of
    something else. Talk to more law enforcement professionals, and fewer career
    politicians.

  • jimmybob137 Post author

    technology will make ban on guns mute point,build your own!

  • chris p cridder cridder Post author

    Unconstitutional …… no red flag laws ….. hit dislike i did …

  • soonermagic24 Post author

    What happens when a fucked up ex wife or ex husband gets a petition on the ex spouse?

  • MAGA COUNTRY Post author

    These so called red flag laws are unconstitutional and shall not pass without a fight. The premise that it will only affect the hateful and those deemed dangerous by whom? It's completely absurd. Who decides what is hateful by what premise? The same with dangerous?

    If a women at a bar says, "That man over there is dangerously attractive… sigh" That may be true but now thanks to you, he can't even own a gun. He's dangerous ! That is how out of context with the law this will get if allowed.

    If any new gun laws pass on conjecture then you might as well take the whole goddamn US Constitution and burn it. Everybody is capable of hate capable of violence capable of being dangerous. It's in our human fucking nature. There. Now come and get my gun. I've got to warn you though, it's been known to give lead poisoning !

  • Randy Melendez Post author

    Even if the 2nd Amendment was repealed. It wouldn't mean anything. I have a right no matter what to defend myself. A god given right.

  • Abner Begley Post author

    There's a war coming we better be prepared.

  • Unklebillybob Post author

    Here's an idea: Start Prosecuting and Executing those who harm or murder people, no matter what weapon they use. However, the democrats don't want to Punish or make criminals responsible for their actions. Nope! All the democrats want to accomplish is to Eliminate the 2nd Amendment and take our guns away ,,,, So the criminals will be the only ones who have Guns. Not going to happen. Good news here is we have an election coming, Very Soon and we can get rid of these Do-Nothing Politicians and protect our 2nd Amendment Rights!

  • Miles North Post author

    RFL are the slow-boil confiscations that would be too labor intensive to carry out: single-sweep includes not only tract housing and apartments, but also multi-acre ranch properties. Also, businesses would need to be searched, including boat yards and auto salvage yards. Gun crisis hoax: gun crime about half of what they were in the mid-1990s.

  • Miles North Post author

    "Solution" for this "problem": everyone conceal carries.

  • Miles North Post author

    Politicians look to legislate away only the crimes sensationally-covered by the MSM, and only based on surface details like how the "offended" gun looks.

    They'll strain the gnat and swallow the camel.

    325,000,000 people live in the U.S.
    ~20,000,000 "assault weapon rifles" (AR-15s, etc.)
    250 homicides/year with "assault weapon rifles"

    Owners of "assault weapon rifles" that murder 250/year will NOT voluntarily surrender their weapons. Why? Those willing to face a murder charge (or even agg. assault, rape or robbery) will have no qualms facing an "illegal weapon possession" charge. Also, those bent on wanton destruction and murder can and will accomplish their goals with handgun(s), as well as knives, swords, acid attacks, truck rentals…

  • 1flungdung Post author

    Screw red flag laws!

  • Celtic Phoenix Post author

    I knew as soon as the 'garlic shooter' occurred two days after MSN published a piece about 'white supremacists cause big problems' they were going to start false flagging. They are trying to take two birds with one stone, targeting white people (making us a criminal race with no rights) and removing our ability to defend ourselves.

  • Mathew Lanier Post author

    Stop complaining and get ready to fight for your freedoms. The time for talking is over and the time to get prepared was yesterday. Suit up // man up // get ready to defend your home. Once a cops agrees to come and suggest you give them your weapons he has vilolated his oath to the constitution and is therefore a robber in his own right. These laws negate my 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 6th amendment rights. This is the line and as Americans, we should show them how this country was founded not grovel as if they are the ones who make the rules. We The People put them in charge. This is not a dictatorship. But it will become one unless you sack up and stop asking for permission. No one asks to be free except someone who knows they aren’t. End of story.

  • Black Dot Post author

    Sadly the constitution means nothing to the people who sworn in to protect it.

  • Benjamin Trif Post author

    They're going to take her guns for talking against red flag law. That's how the law works. Fucking disgusting

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *