Major Landmark Cases of Supreme Court 2018 | Latest Judgements of 2018

Major Landmark Cases of Supreme Court 2018 | Latest Judgements of 2018

Articles , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 35 Comments



hey everybody may who Priya and Abdi Chris Raja legal I'd say put salt a little law or legal news newspaper kick short is a section Micawber kita et but which LaSalle political news says Dada law or legal news new headlines when I hear its Casati we repeal a video map visible over a request here team a Supreme Court ordered landmark judgments or legal news in some public video by now though a silly asking video who naval I information save her agua subsea Bellamy Park and a value though has are attractive pants landmark judgment Skiba remain is Casati video K n Mayacamas ng does or se llama judgments the exam point of view see importantly the Shirou contain a doe has are attracted top five countdown ke saath mera pehla case a ad harkey's that is justice case put a Swami versus Union of India is case baito major question what is a privacy colicky the doors are satrom establish one or do some ad hoc Palicki the supreme could make his case Malaika ha he ha ha at the valid he was kicked good sections could repeal kar diya satis a good sections for amend Correa his judgment Casa de raha he a private services Kelly they say mobile connections Kelly a bank account Scalia in sub Kelly ad-hoc art produced cannot mandate in he and her act jokey pass were the doors are Swami whose come mean objective top ad hoc o a voluntary excise banana but D raided a government is a mandatory and compulsory Curtis ret they say government gives had such private services Kelly be ad hoc art summit cannot mandate three huggy akka is Casati ad hoc Armitage loopholes pithy Jess a section 47 he Agora card her cut gu muchacha hey cows can humble leek Hajek ahead to octopus whose Kelly a koi legal remedy Nene in he sub loopholes who address connect he retired Justice case put a Swami knee it PIL file key discrete domi the registry pahala to right to privacy colicky the dough has asset remain nine the discreet constitutional bench get through yay recognized his citizens of India kept us right to privacy here do some major issued her add her active validity go legally they say decided he aria 26 September 2018 May 5 the district constitutional bench name is bench name for is to one key majority see add her at Quesada the provisions call valid her ayah but good significant sections go hetalia this is section 33 close to section 47 and section 57 to is judgment Kisaragi he he a private services Kelly they say school med mission lineally a bank account Cavani key a mobile connection clear in sorry cheese Oh Kelly ad hard Cardenas a Ruina he Moustakas a euthanasia key burning his case but Supreme Court me ye recognize here keep that right to die with dignity is an integral part of right to live with dignity is he case key where they say India may up clearly or guidelines case SOT passive euthanasia or living will valid this case a petitioners name article 32 he and Eric PIL file key or yeh issue attire Kiki right to live with dignity includes the right to die with dignity or ye question you know new hire terminally ill patients yeah Volokh do permanent vegetative state mayhem on kill year his case called the sidecar Nicky Lee pan the disc a bench constitute we you know nay unanimously judgment pronounced here but decision soon on is a pale a uni is he subject matters related teen piranha judgments were analyzed carefully yeh kya key article 21 cut essential attribute hota hai dignity or dignity guy essential feature hota hai the right to choose his case may have bad karate terminally ill patients yell Vologda PVA state way unka the freedom to choose medication she said decide cutaway Courtney yeh caja he in case of terminally ill patients or patients in PVA state we recognize the right of passive euthanasia is kiss Sachi Courtney advanced medical directive or living will dono go he legally recognized cutaway which guidelines here Jess a medical directive key rahega hospitals cap adopting a authorities kokia order follow karna he yes'm sorry sir agar Queens on previous May or up me consent nahi they sat ahead to see estate me gay rights Malay is Calibri direction the away head me at T sake say Sabri melodic Cooper is case may Supreme Court knee gender discrimination Cookham cart away caja give women of all ages can enter the supreme Allah temple sati Supreme Court me a kaha if Sabri mana temple he took practices they go Hindu women key right give or later Sabri male temple jockey managed cage at the head they were swamp Orca through innkeepers poori legal authority he give a temple cape sorry decisions LASIK a AB in honey a ban impose Kia King Cooper woman Cooper on came menstrual age may MATLAB 10 C 50-gauge group Kelly a big banner only impose hiyata Kerala Hindu places of public worship rules K rule 3 be gender do you get ahead he again Kobe customer usage women can prepare Okla Hanako kita here – Oh Scott Harper of women cover ship kinase a rogue 16 though in his of cheese oka leaky a present case file who are just kid though meter issues they pahala ke kya Lord Aiyappa giver shippers article 26 kita head ik religious denomination formulate kurta hey Jana he or doosra kick Clyde you ban impose Kia haka rule 3 began their ki a rule parent at key ultra vires hair Jana he his case could decide car Nikoli on the disc E bench Betty Jean honey 4 is 2 1 K majority C judgment pronounced here pahala issue do religious denomination colita is killa mentioning a kaha ki religious denomination bunny Keely article 26 myth theme conditions DV here or in teen oka fulfill Munna compulsory here article 26 my big 18 conditions or present case codec the Highway Code Nick aha he is case me Yeti no conditions fulfill me ho t here is Li a lord I a packet of worshipers hey whoa its separate religious denomination for militant a Boozer I shoulda ruled three be colicky today he executed body Jovie rules formulated Kirti he was a active objective sake consonance may Hinata here we say acts a parallel Hinata here Yuki act say he to rules and regulations banana keep our drive with you here to rule 3 be here you derive what a parent at K through you have a parent at Konami Kerala Hindu places of public worship authorization of entry act 1965 his key Code section some lichte here this is section 3 do a get ahead he a public place of worship Hindu kisara sessions or classes Kili open rahega is he at a section for the temple authorities core power provide katha hey Oscar proviso aka ahead he is a kid through gob regulations bandura he that shall not be discriminatory to any Hindu apne yellow section so they clear in those sections may do word use hagun his section or class is he defined Cayuga he is active section 2 B or C me in key definition may women could include he agai women or men could discriminate nahi kiya to parent a key sorry sections they can me ye so much Mata he he is arcamax a woman could exclude Kanaya restrict cannon ajita talk a rules Co object of women to restrict carnahan to a parent acted contrary here you parent a key ultra vires here finally decision to not have Supreme Court Nia caja ke sorry rules the woman who exclude cart a yet discriminatory here is Lane it cotton cadenas are here will be judgment kasiraja give women of all ages are allowed to enter the temple cha-cha major judgment here decriminalization of sections 377 the criminalization of homosexuality is case my Supreme Court may apply Purana judgments who Galactica receive a yay kaha K India me same-sex relationship is not a crime is case come in a deeply discuss key I is video may its video Kalinka over description per ml jaga next case Rika is casement Supreme Court keep ponder just keep bench named unanimously section 497 repeal turtle yay kaha ke extramarital sex is not a criminal offense to is case may Supreme Court knee section 497 criminal provision cotton kardia section 497 bad cat ahead adultery key gig s offensive you skip teen requirements a pahala sexual intercourse must be committed with the wife of another man second the person must have knowledge that the woman is married and is the wife of another man or theorem he said sexual intercourse must be without the consent of the husband adultery coughing's commit cunningly latino conditions fulfill Karnas Rudi Houda head you press in case he was Mike Joseph shine jockey petitioner hey own unique PIL file key tacky 497 may Jovi general discrimination hora hey Oscar doe be adverse impact it was Hibiki Tom who secured his case could decide connect Ely on the risky bench constitute Keighley general unanimously decision dia or one 58 year-old loco scrub-down cardia decision did they work bench knee the hell Aikido cases could be analyzed yeah Youssef Abdulazeez vs. state of Bombay or saw me through Vishnu vs. Union of India in dono he judgments me section 497 Co sanctity of marriage go protect cunningly valid kaha akka but is judgment me Acharya is section 4 97 car primary purpose a to protect the property of men or iske sanctity of marriage see Co Elena de Rana here judgment death a work section 497 keyboard sorry girl TIA highlight kegel Jessie other adult Rika orphans who are hey Joseph whoa husband just give wife adultery with char melty savour he complained file kar sakta hai toh aisi board sorry points the gender bias noise colicky they say adultery Kitaj kill men pay luxottica safe husband he contained file curse at the hey women keepers complaint file kanika co-write nahi kiya aur agar sexual intercourse unmarried women kiss at hora he to adultery coffins they extend him a hooter we sorry guilty addictive a Supreme Court Makaha he Section four ninety-seven gender-discrimination kartha hai aur woh article 14 15 and 21 teen okay he tests me failed whoo yeah is he here section 497 cooked right down Cardenas ha ha / adultery is still a grounds for divorce or other adultery give a JC aggrieved spouse suicide cut ahead to adulterous Pao's Co section 3 0 6 scan their MATLAB abetment of suicide can they try Kiera sacked ahead to eat okay no hazard attract he passed landmark judgments about that they though has our track a couch or landmark does Minsky the exam point of view say both important yes re he cases those are a trauma decide who a hey Swapna three party was a Supreme Court of India case may decide were you sorry constitutional cases Joe national importance que hay una ki live streaming ki jai radha soami no Donohue nagar case a Shailesh my new paper Mar versus Election Commission of India state of Maharashtra vs. Vijay go Greggy case say SC or st employee school promotion maybe reservation Malaga SK bug Chief Justice of India is first amongst equal Chief Justice of India is the master of roasted beside wah hey Shanti Bhushan was a Supreme Court of India case may or Shafi'i ahankhah case they say Hadiya case because Jetta hey it's me year decide WA the fundamental right me right to change of say be included here Baba's a Maruti calmly vs. state of Maharashtra key case mihika Agatha Kyogre death sentence against SLP file kita a here the webinar is in the away dismissed nahi Kiyosaki Bar Council of India was his a cable educates me a kahega key foreign law firms ending quotes my practice in the haters at this public interest foundation vs. Union of India iike smiie iike hagia he election the candidates so if a slave is qualified nahi ho Jangi qqn Kagan's criminal charges like and pollution comedy Nazareth David Fatah cookie online would creeper Wroclaw Ghana or green firecrackers allow carnival judgment a Arjun Gopal and others versus Union of India finally Lillith Yadav was a state of is gonna be a kaha ki rape victim key identity disclosed in the Hickey recipe I hope I discuss key ways sorry cases of sahaja yogi or agar aapke Meera a video person Idaho so please subscribe to my channel and don't forget to like this video that's it for now see you in the next class bye bye also a very happy new year

35 thoughts on “Major Landmark Cases of Supreme Court 2018 | Latest Judgements of 2018

  • Jwala Jose

    Wow I just discovered your channel… Thank you so much.

  • Poonam Thalor

    Ma'm for reservation in promotion ..mane knhi or vijay ghogre case nhi but uska name Garnail Singh vs. Lacchmi Gupta 2018 dekha h…m confused ..bataye konsa case ka name correct h

  • Anshul Satyanweshi

    Hi Priya,

    When talking abut the Sabrimala case, you did not discuss the dissenting judgement of justice Indu Malhotra.
    First of all, I denounce any discrimination which is disabling in nature on unjust & unverifiable grounds.

    Main objective of this open letter is to discuss the importance and implications of dissenting judgments and the majoritarian approach of justice.
    I have a few questions, you are not obligated to answer these but a discussion would only lead to quality enhancement of the understanding of those who share my concerns.

    Q1: Is it only a ritualistic practice to give dissenting judgments, just to make the process of justice look "FAIR"? or are there any other implications ?
    Q2: How about trying to satisfy and convince the dissenting judge{by the majority}?
    Q3: Is there any procedure anywhere in the world, which wards, the process of justice against the human fallacies(eg: psyche of the judge){Except for making it extremely mechanical}? Mechanical process of law would lead to crude interpretations and may not be consistent with the evolving society.

    Do discuss morrison vs olson case in US {Ethics in government act 1978}.

    Thanks & Regards,
    Anshul

  • Pradyumna Behera

    I don't ever found like a so intellectual teacher

  • Akr

    Nice description

  • Paras Garg

    Thanxs finology legal

  • Dipjyoti Ghosh

    Mam mein mere state PSC k liye pad Raha hoon to kuch salo se Landmark case ko lekar bohot questions aa rahe hain to best book konsa hoga un sab case k liye please help me. Golknath case se last time 2 questions aaya tha ese bohot question aa rahe hain please konsa book acha hoga bol dijiye.

  • MANISH KUMAR

    Thanks mam

  • Abhishek R

    I love you this girl

  • Gautam Pandey

    Mam du llb ke liye kuch unique video bnao..pls

  • narayana swami

    Support who want in English only

  • narayana swami

    Hey everybody I am Priya

  • Ashutosh Belwal

    Crisp, clear presentation. Very useful. Many thanks.

  • Mourab Pal

    Looking nice… 😊

  • Rakshi Padhan

    Mam plz help me for my ojs xam

  • Utkarsh Rai

    Pls mam prepare a video lecture series fro 2018 to 2019 monthly and yearly lectures on 2018 -2019 supreme court important judgements analysis, new law and amendments 2018 to 2019 analysis. I'm judiciary aspirants your videos are very helpful for judicial services mains and pre exams.

  • Sanjay Kumar

    Very nice video lecture

  • Astro N Love Tips

    Hlo .. UPSC mains k Liye b koi video bna do G

  • zameer inamdar

    Madam my mother cousin sister void Marriage Act net madam void Marriage Act can this possible this marriage so kindly need any one case this that matter and send to my act modem no I think is no

  • Aditya Shekhar

    thankx.

  • yogita kale

    Very nice videos mam, Could you make separate video on Adultery case please.

  • r navaneeth bhatt

    Excellent way of presentation. Until watching your video, reading Judgments was a nightmare. Thank you for such a great initiative, all the very best for future videos on legal knowledge…..Hope to see you with more such videos…..

  • Akanksha Mudgal

    किसी आवेदन को विचारोपरांत कहकर निरस्त नहीं किया जा सकता, उसके लिये पूरा कारण लिखना चाहिए। यह किस जजमेंट में कहा है। प्लीज प्रोवाइड इन्फॉर्मेशन

  • Shadab Ahmad

    Ma'am, make videos on Family Law- Muslim And Hindu Marriage Act.. (0 level to 100 for LLB entrance exam)

  • Prakhar Thukral

    Can you make a video on how to write subjective question on clat pg paper in 800 words.

  • Hardik More

    i request u to make videos on international law for clat exam point of view

  • Somnanda Das

    wonderful explanation.

  • Dikshant Johar

    Video editor, here comes a bro-fist

  • Chhama 91

    Euthanasia main case Aruna shaunbag

  • Raja Pandit

    You have very good presentation skills and quickly form Good Rapport with the viewers.

  • FIRST IN ALL

    Effort s awesome

  • FIRST IN ALL

    U didn't mention articles violates in cases please mention

  • Mohd Saleem

    Very nice mam. U talked in a smiling way to avoid viewers getting bored. I like ur way. Love❤

  • bhai ji

    13:03 hahahaha

  • Aashna Mishra

    Hello Priya
    And what is name of the case relating death penalty to rapist who rape below 12 years. Please tell me fast as my clat exam is coming

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *