Judge Rejects DOJ Request For New Legal Team In Census Case | MTP Daily | MSNBC

Judge Rejects DOJ Request For New Legal Team In Census Case | MTP Daily | MSNBC

Articles, Blog , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 100 Comments


>>>WELCOME BACK.>>>WELCOME BACK. WE HAVE BREAKING NEWS IN THE WE HAVE BREAKING NEWS IN THE FIGHT OVER WHETHER A CITIZENSHIP FIGHT OVER WHETHER A CITIZENSHIP QUESTION CAN BE INCLUDED ON THE QUESTION CAN BE INCLUDED ON THE CENSUS. CENSUS. MINUTES AGO A FEDERAL JUDGE MINUTES AGO A FEDERAL JUDGE REJECTED THE JUSTICE REJECTED THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S REQUEST TO ASSIGN A DEPARTMENT’S REQUEST TO ASSIGN A NEW LEGAL TEAM TO ITS LAWSUIT. NEW LEGAL TEAM TO ITS LAWSUIT. THE JUDGE SAYS THE DEPARTMENT OF THE JUDGE SAYS THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DIDN’T PROVIDE A JUSTICE DIDN’T PROVIDE A LEGITIMATE EXPLANATION FOR THE LEGITIMATE EXPLANATION FOR THE CHANGE, WHICH IT ANNOUNCED ON CHANGE, WHICH IT ANNOUNCED ON SUNDAY. SUNDAY. THIS COMES A DAY AFTER ATTORNEY THIS COMES A DAY AFTER ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL BARR SAID HE GENERAL BILL BARR SAID HE BELIEVES THERE IS A LEGAL PATH BELIEVES THERE IS A LEGAL PATH TO ADDING THE CITIZENSHIP TO ADDING THE CITIZENSHIP QUESTION TO THE CENSUS. QUESTION TO THE CENSUS. WITH ME NOW IS DALE HO DIRECTOR WITH ME NOW IS DALE HO DIRECTOR OF THE ACLU’S VOTING RIGHTS OF THE ACLU’S VOTING RIGHTS PROJECT WHO ARGUED THE PROJECT WHO ARGUED THE ORGANIZATION’S CASE BEFORE THE ORGANIZATION’S CASE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT. SUPREME COURT. SIR, THANKS FOR BEING HERE. SIR, THANKS FOR BEING HERE.>>THANKS FOR HAVING ME.>>THANKS FOR HAVING ME.>>SO LET’S START HERE.>>SO LET’S START HERE. DO YOU READ ANYTHING INTO THIS DO YOU READ ANYTHING INTO THIS BREAKING NEWS THAT THE DOJ — OR BREAKING NEWS THAT THE DOJ — OR THAT THE FEDERAL JUDGE SAYS THE THAT THE FEDERAL JUDGE SAYS THE DOJ CAN’T CHANGE THEIR LEGAL DOJ CAN’T CHANGE THEIR LEGAL TEAM MIDSTREAM? TEAM MIDSTREAM?>>I DO.>>I DO. THE ADMINISTRATION’S ACTING LIKE THE ADMINISTRATION’S ACTING LIKE IT HAS SOMETHING TO HIDE. IT HAS SOMETHING TO HIDE. IT’S VERY UNUSUAL, IN FACT, I IT’S VERY UNUSUAL, IN FACT, I THINK IT’S UNPRECEDENTED FOR AN THINK IT’S UNPRECEDENTED FOR AN ADMINISTRATION TO SWAP OUT ITS ADMINISTRATION TO SWAP OUT ITS ENTIRE LEGAL TEAM THAT’S BEEN ENTIRE LEGAL TEAM THAT’S BEEN WORKING ON A CASE FOR OVER A WORKING ON A CASE FOR OVER A YEAR THE WAY THE TRUMP YEAR THE WAY THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS TRIED TO DO ADMINISTRATION HAS TRIED TO DO HERE. HERE. AND I THINK IT’S RELATED TO A AND I THINK IT’S RELATED TO A KEY REPRESENTATION THAT THE KEY REPRESENTATION THAT THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS BEEN TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS BEEN RELYING ON THROUGHOUT THIS RELYING ON THROUGHOUT THIS ENTIRE LITIGATION WHICH IS THAT ENTIRE LITIGATION WHICH IS THAT TO THE CENSUS FORM CAN’T OCCUR TO THE CENSUS FORM CAN’T OCCUR AFTER JUNE 30th A DATE THAT’S AFTER JUNE 30th A DATE THAT’S ALREADY PASSED. ALREADY PASSED. THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION USED THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION USED THAT REPRESENTATION TO CONVINCE THAT REPRESENTATION TO CONVINCE THE SUPREME COURT TO HEAR THIS THE SUPREME COURT TO HEAR THIS CASE ON AN EXPEDITED BASIS. CASE ON AN EXPEDITED BASIS. NOW THEY’RE COMING BACK AND NOW THEY’RE COMING BACK AND SAYING WELL EVEN THOUGH THAT SAYING WELL EVEN THOUGH THAT JUNE 30th DEADLINE IS PAST, JUNE 30th DEADLINE IS PAST, WE’RE STILL CONSIDERING MAKING WE’RE STILL CONSIDERING MAKING FURTHER CHANGES TO THE CENSUS FURTHER CHANGES TO THE CENSUS QUESTIONNAIRE. QUESTIONNAIRE. THAT LEAVES TWO POSSIBILITY, THAT LEAVES TWO POSSIBILITY, EITHER ONE THE ADMINISTRATION EITHER ONE THE ADMINISTRATION LIED TO THE SUPREME COURT OR LIED TO THE SUPREME COURT OR TWO, THE ADMINISTRATION IS LYING TWO, THE ADMINISTRATION IS LYING NOW WHEN THEY’RE SAYING THEY NOW WHEN THEY’RE SAYING THEY MIGHT CHANGE THE CENSUS MIGHT CHANGE THE CENSUS QUESTIONNAIRE WITHOUT IT QUESTIONNAIRE WITHOUT IT AFFECTING THE ACCURACY OF THE AFFECTING THE ACCURACY OF THE CENSUS AND THE TEAM OF LAWYERS CENSUS AND THE TEAM OF LAWYERS AT DOJ THAT WAS WITHDRAWING FROM AT DOJ THAT WAS WITHDRAWING FROM THE CASE MIGHT MO THE AINS TO THE CASE MIGHT MO THE AINS TO THAT. THAT.>>SO THE PRESIDENT AND THE>>SO THE PRESIDENT AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL HAVE BOTH ATTORNEY GENERAL HAVE BOTH SUGGESTED THAT THEY HAVE OPTIONS SUGGESTED THAT THEY HAVE OPTIONS OBVIOUSLY BEYOND WHAT HAD OBVIOUSLY BEYOND WHAT HAD HAPPENED IN THE ARGUMENTS THAT HAPPENED IN THE ARGUMENTS THAT YOU MADE BEFORE THE SUPREME YOU MADE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT. COURT. BARR SAID YESTERDAY WE’VE BEEN BARR SAID YESTERDAY WE’VE BEEN CONSIDERING ALL THE OPTIONS. CONSIDERING ALL THE OPTIONS. I’VE BEEN IN CON STAND SQUUGS I’VE BEEN IN CON STAND SQUUGS WITH THE PRESIDENT. WITH THE PRESIDENT. I THINK OVER THE NEXT DAY OR SO I THINK OVER THE NEXT DAY OR SO YOU’LL SEE THE APPROACH WE’RE YOU’LL SEE THE APPROACH WE’RE TAKING. TAKING. I THINK THE DECISION DOES I THINK THE DECISION DOES PROVIDE A PATH FOR GETTING THE PROVIDE A PATH FOR GETTING THE QUESTION ON THE CENSUS. QUESTION ON THE CENSUS. DO YOU HAVE A SENSE OF WHAT THE DO YOU HAVE A SENSE OF WHAT THE ADMINISTRATION’S PATH IS THAT ADMINISTRATION’S PATH IS THAT THEY INTENDED TO TAKE? THEY INTENDED TO TAKE?>>I DON’T.>>I DON’T. I THINK IT’S PRETTY TELLING THEY I THINK IT’S PRETTY TELLING THEY HAVEN’T COME FORWARD WITH THEIR HAVEN’T COME FORWARD WITH THEIR SECRET PLAN YET. SECRET PLAN YET. I THINK IT SHOWS A LACK OF I THINK IT SHOWS A LACK OF CONFIDENCE IN THE LEGALITY OF CONFIDENCE IN THE LEGALITY OF WHAT THEY WANT TO DO HERE IN THE WHAT THEY WANT TO DO HERE IN THE FIRST FEW DAYS AFTER THE FIRST FEW DAYS AFTER THE DECISION, THE ADMINISTRATION DECISION, THE ADMINISTRATION CONCEDED IN COURT AND SAID THAT CONCEDED IN COURT AND SAID THAT THEY WEREN’T GOING TO TRY TO ADD THEY WEREN’T GOING TO TRY TO ADD THE QUESTION. THE QUESTION. I THINK THAT REFLECTED A I THINK THAT REFLECTED A RECOGNITION THAT THEY DIDN’T RECOGNITION THAT THEY DIDN’T HAVE ANY GOOD LEGAL OPTIONS AND HAVE ANY GOOD LEGAL OPTIONS AND THEN THE DAY AFTER THAT, TRUMP THEN THE DAY AFTER THAT, TRUMP THREW A TEMPER TANTRUM AND ON THREW A TEMPER TANTRUM AND ON TWITTER ANNOUNCED HE WOULD PUT TWITTER ANNOUNCED HE WOULD PUT THE QUESTION BACK ON AND THE THE QUESTION BACK ON AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SAID WE MIGHT ATTORNEY GENERAL SAID WE MIGHT AS WELL TAKE A SHOT WHICH IS THE AS WELL TAKE A SHOT WHICH IS THE NOT EXACTLY THE MOST CONFIDENCE NOT EXACTLY THE MOST CONFIDENCE INSPIRING STATEMENT ABOUT A INSPIRING STATEMENT ABOUT A LEGAL PLAN I’VE EVER HEARD. LEGAL PLAN I’VE EVER HEARD. I MEAN THE SUPREME COURT’S I MEAN THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION SAID AT — SAID A LOT DECISION SAID AT — SAID A LOT OF THINGS BUT TWO IN PARTICULAR. OF THINGS BUT TWO IN PARTICULAR. ONE THIS DECISION HAS TO HAPPEN ONE THIS DECISION HAS TO HAPPEN BY JUNE 30th BECAUSE YOU CAN’T BY JUNE 30th BECAUSE YOU CAN’T CHANGE THE FORMS AFTER THAT CHANGE THE FORMS AFTER THAT DATE, AND TWO, THE ATTEMPT TO DATE, AND TWO, THE ATTEMPT TO PUT A CITIZENSHIP QUESTION ON PUT A CITIZENSHIP QUESTION ON THE QUESTIONNAIRE IS ILLEGAL. THE QUESTIONNAIRE IS ILLEGAL. I THINK THAT ENDS THE STORY. I THINK THAT ENDS THE STORY.>>SO WHAT HAPPENS IF THE>>SO WHAT HAPPENS IF THE PRESIDENT JUST DOES GO AHEAD AND PRESIDENT JUST DOES GO AHEAD AND PUT THIS QUESTION ON THE CENSUS PUT THIS QUESTION ON THE CENSUS FORMS? FORMS? MEAN, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN IN THE MEAN, WHAT DOES THAT MEAN IN THE CONTEXT OF THE LAW AND IS THERE CONTEXT OF THE LAW AND IS THERE ANY RECOURSE FOR THOSE OF YOU ANY RECOURSE FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE ARGUING AGAINST IT. WHO ARE ARGUING AGAINST IT.>>WELL, I THINK YOU KNOW, WE’LL>>WELL, I THINK YOU KNOW, WE’LL HAVE TO SEE EXACTLY WHAT IT IS HAVE TO SEE EXACTLY WHAT IT IS THAT THE PRESIDENT HAS PLANNED THAT THE PRESIDENT HAS PLANNED HERE. HERE. I DON’T THINK THEY QUITE NOTE I DON’T THINK THEY QUITE NOTE YET AT THIS POINT EITHER. YET AT THIS POINT EITHER. BUT IF THE PRESIDENT GOES BUT IF THE PRESIDENT GOES FORWARD AND TRIES TO ADD THE FORWARD AND TRIES TO ADD THE CITIZENSHIP QUESTION TO THE CITIZENSHIP QUESTION TO THE QUESTIONNAIRE, HE’LL BE IN OPEN QUESTIONNAIRE, HE’LL BE IN OPEN DEFIANCE OF A RULING BY THE DEFIANCE OF A RULING BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND TO THAT ALL I CAN SAY IS WE’LL TO THAT ALL I CAN SAY IS WE’LL SEE HIM IN COURT. SEE HIM IN COURT.>>DOES THAT SEEM LIKE AN>>DOES THAT SEEM LIKE AN UNPRECEDENTED SITUATION TO YOU UNPRECEDENTED SITUATION TO YOU FOR THIS ADMINISTRATION. FOR THIS ADMINISTRATION.>>I MEAN, THIS ADMINISTRATION>>I MEAN, THIS ADMINISTRATION HAS BEEN A BASKET OF HAS BEEN A BASKET OF UNPRECEDENTEDS. UNPRECEDENTEDS. SO IT’S HARD FOR ME TO SORT OF SO IT’S HARD FOR ME TO SORT OF IDENTIFY THIS AS YOU KNOW, THE IDENTIFY THIS AS YOU KNOW, THE MOST UNPRECEDENTED THING THAT MOST UNPRECEDENTED THING THAT THIS ADMINISTRATION HAS DONE. THIS ADMINISTRATION HAS DONE. BUT LOOK, THEY LOST IN THE BUT LOOK, THEY LOST IN THE SUPREME COURT. SUPREME COURT. THEY SAID JUNE 30th WAS THE THEY SAID JUNE 30th WAS THE DEADLINE. DEADLINE. THE DEADLINE HAS PASSED. THE DEADLINE HAS PASSED. THERE’S NO MULLIGAN HERE. THERE’S NO MULLIGAN HERE.>>SO THEY ALSO, THE PRESIDENT>>SO THEY ALSO, THE PRESIDENT IN THE WAKE OF THIS DECISION HAS IN THE WAKE OF THIS DECISION HAS ALSO SEEMED TO BE RELATIVELY ALSO SEEMED TO BE RELATIVELY CLEAR ABOUT HIS MOTIVE FOR CLEAR ABOUT HIS MOTIVE FOR WANTING TO PUT THIS QUESTION ON WANTING TO PUT THIS QUESTION ON CENSUS WHICH HAS BEEN THE CENSUS WHICH HAS BEEN THE SUBJECT OF ALL THESE ORIGINAL SUBJECT OF ALL THESE ORIGINAL DEBATES. DEBATES. TAKE A LOOK AT HOW THE PRESIDENT TAKE A LOOK AT HOW THE PRESIDENT FRAMED IT. FRAMED IT.>>YOU NEED IT FOR MANY REASONS.>>YOU NEED IT FOR MANY REASONS. YOU NEED IT FOR CONGRESS, FOR YOU NEED IT FOR CONGRESS, FOR DISTRICTING. DISTRICTING. YOU NEED IT FOR APPROPRIATIONS. YOU NEED IT FOR APPROPRIATIONS. ALREADY WITH THE FUNDS GOING? ALREADY WITH THE FUNDS GOING? HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE THERE? HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE THERE? ARE THEY CITIZENS? ARE THEY CITIZENS? ARE THEY NOT CITIZENS. ARE THEY NOT CITIZENS. YOU NEED IT FOR MANY REASONS. YOU NEED IT FOR MANY REASONS.>>ISN’T THE PRESIDENT>>ISN’T THE PRESIDENT ESSENTIALLY MAKING THE CASE ESSENTIALLY MAKING THE CASE THERE IS THAT HAS ALL ABOUT THERE IS THAT HAS ALL ABOUT POLITICS, IT’S ALL ABOUT POLITICS, IT’S ALL ABOUT REDISTRICTING. REDISTRICTING.>HE IS MAKING THE CASE THAT>HE IS MAKING THE CASE THAT IT’S CONNECTED TO A LONG-TERM IT’S CONNECTED TO A LONG-TERM STRATEGY TO TRY TO DRAIN STRATEGY TO TRY TO DRAIN POLITICAL REPRESENTATION FROM POLITICAL REPRESENTATION FROM COMMUNITIES OF COLOR AND TO COMMUNITIES OF COLOR AND TO BOOST THE PROSPECTS OF THE BOOST THE PROSPECTS OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AND WHICH REPUBLICAN PARTY AND WHICH SECRET DOCUMENTS REVEALED SECRET DOCUMENTS REVEALED NON-HISPANIC WHITES IN THE WORDS NON-HISPANIC WHITES IN THE WORDS OF A REPUBLICAN REDISTRICT OF A REPUBLICAN REDISTRICT STRATEGIST. STRATEGIST. I THINK IT DIRECTLY CONNECTS TO I THINK IT DIRECTLY CONNECTS TO THE ALLEGATIONS THAT FROM THE THE ALLEGATIONS THAT FROM THE BEGINNING THIS HAS BEEN BEGINNING THIS HAS BEEN MOTIVATED BY AN ATTEMPT TO HARM

100 thoughts on “Judge Rejects DOJ Request For New Legal Team In Census Case | MTP Daily | MSNBC

  • Lindsay Post author

    ⚪ #WompWomp
    ⚪ #ThoughtsAndPrayers
    ⚪ #IReallyDontCareDoU
    🔘 #AllOfTheAbove

  • Marky E Post author

    "I will make it legal" Bullfrog Barr channels his true face as Palpatine.

  • KING TRUMP Post author

    Barr is still coming !!!
    You can't stop him..
    👮👮👮🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • Antonio Martinez Post author

    LOL

  • Martin Moyes Post author

    Definition of a banana republic: when the head of your justice department makes open defiance of your supreme court . . .

  • Tony Hill Post author

    So trump defies Congress and now he defies the Supreme Court and what point does the Generals defy the Executive and overthrows Trump?

  • Ganiscol Post author

    trump and his sycophants think they are so clever, but they entangle themselves in lies to a Federal Court and the Supreme Court – if you want to see what 'stupid as a doornail' looks like, look no further.

    And they double down onidiocy by putting the (quote Neal Katyal) F-Team on the case: Consumer protection lawyers. Constitutional matters are not their field of expertise, what does barr think he can achieve by this?

  • BikeMike Post author

    The US is a banana republic.

  • princeoftidds Post author

    What's the purpose of the Department of Justice? Are they law enforcement? Sure seems like they're using the weight of our tax-funded agency to satisfy the whims of a madman…

  • Dr. Jerry Garrett Post author

    President Trump is the greatest President this country has had in eons of time. He appeals to traditional mainstream America. That destructive leftist Existentialistic model of, "Anything goes?" Well, that dog wont hunt!

  • G53X0Y0Z0 Post author

    It's amazing how low the left wing will stoop to use non-citizens to gain illegitimate power.

  • Miss Amazon Post author

    All the people that Trump gets involved in his dictatorship….must be costing the country a LOT of tax payer dollars!!🙄

  • Impromptu Post author

    Bit crazy to call the Trump presidency an "administration" – it doesn't seem to actually administer anything.

  • bootnsoot Post author

    I love how the word "unprecedented " means "criminal" in this administration.

  • white sox pride Post author

    The blasphemy we the people have the right to know who's a citizen & who's not. MAGA 🇺🇸 🇺🇸

  • Michael C Post author

    Republicans need it for votes and redistricting. Suppressing the vote in anyway they can. If your worried about their citizenship, make the pathway easier and more accessible for the people already here and create a better vetting process for those coming in that is not malicious to the families

  • Vlodec Post author

    I watch the news, day after day, and increasingly the same term keeps springing to mind: banana republic.

  • Tiger Tiger Post author

    What a place the US must be

  • Vivian Couper Post author

    This is what happens when you have a President who is immune to logic.

  • tdbbna2 Post author

    The IRS has this information on everyone……

  • davmanx Post author

    HOW DARE YOU
    I am President King Trump
    I can do whatever I like
    I can abolish, ban, remove anything I don't like
    You Are Fired

  • kare more Post author

    Hahahahaha!

  • CJ J Post author

    Pumpkinhead just needs a valid reason for the question to be on the census. If people that are here illegally will be eligible for Medicare for All, the government needs to know how many non-citizens are here. Dems pandering pulls a loss out of a victory.

  • edwin semidey Post author

    Bill Barr must be removed from office he is tarnished and a Trump crony Yes Master is all he knows how to say to Trump.

  • Matt Foley Post author

    If you want a good laugh search "judge rules against Trump" and see how many hits you get.

  • ruth depew Post author

    The original DOJ legal team worked for over a year to defend contrived reason number one and lost. This team refused to further damage their personal reputations in pursuit of an even more contrived reason number two. Barr's choices are to A) for once do the right thing and say the DOJ will not continue on this matter or B) fire the legal team and try again to continue down his path to perdition.

  • RhondaH Post author

    How in the world will Republicans survive if they can't gerrymander districts in their favor? LMAO That's the whole point. The Republicans have to cheat, lie and steal elections. They will even sell the country to our enemies if they have to. Their use of social issues that even they don't hold to in order to get the gullible evangelical crowd to vote for them is a cheat and dispicable tactic. Such a corrupt political party needs to go down.

  • Big Dick Post author

    RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA!
    Now the world See's Hillary invented the Russia scandal!!!

    Yet, when you Dems actually did think Trump was a Russian spy, you cried about Russia interfering in our elections!!!!!

    But now somehow, for some reason, you want illegal Mexicans to be able to vote—:IF THEY VOTE FOR YOU????
    WHAT ABOUT ILLEGAL RUSSIANS?

    OR PEOPLE IN THE UK, OR ANYWHERE ELSE???

    CAN THEY VOTE TOO??..

    YOU ANTI AMERICAN TRAITORS ARE ABOUT TO BECOME AN EXTINCT RACE OF PEOPLE!– BECAUSE WE ARE 100% DONE WITH YOU!

    DEATH TO THE TRAITORS!
    TRUMP 2020 ¯_(ツ)_/¯

  • David Copperfield-not the magician Post author

    T does not care what is legal. He only wants what he wants. He breaks every law and rule that stands in front of what he wants. We all clearly see that, right? He has gotten worse and worse and he will continue to get worse. T is a monster. Period.

  • yo yo Post author

    4:50 Give this buffoon imbecile simpleton trumpp an accordion and maybe he'll resign and live out his passion of playing the accordion

  • ManSpider Is Totally Different Post author

    Hahaha haha theyre gonna be sick of being losers

  • Wim Philipsen Post author

    The father of mr Barr was also a friend of mr Epstein. Give him a job as a high school teacher, he wasn’t even qualified for the job. Was was going on there and then, can someone tell me?

  • Suzanne Lowrie Post author

    Oh, great! I’ve been praying for death by cheeseburger, but incarceration for defying the Supreme Court will do. Let the orange traitor wear an orange jumpsuit.

  • Nico Hernandez Post author

    Of course he did! But my President has many legal avenues to get it done. A majority of American people have said"We should know how many legal people are here!" Why not? Oh yeah that's right they want to win elections no matter how! Don't lie,cheat,or steal the democraps hate competition!

  • Rayenal Owens Post author

    Well done

  • wily wascal Post author

    Just when you thought it was rock bottom, Barr keeps getting lower, and lower, and lower….

  • wily wascal Post author

    Say what you will about B.S. Barr, he's an amazingly quick worker–in no time, he's transformed DOJ into the Department of Jokes!

  • wily wascal Post author

    Republicans creating separate, UNEQUAL justice, putting themselves above law.

  • wily wascal Post author

    Republicans only care about elections to see how they can be rigged in their favor.

  • wily wascal Post author

    Betsy Ross sewed the flag. Commerce Sec. Wilbur Ross shat on it.

  • wily wascal Post author

    DOJ lawyer on Census question: "The situation is very fluid."
    Judge: Not supposed to be fluid, SCOTUS case settled, you lost!
    DOJ AAG: Toddler Trump decided to have a Constitutional crisis…

  • wily wascal Post author

    Trump trying to achieve pyrrhic victory, doubling down on stupid with Census whiplash! Go, baby, go! Slimy pig gliding down the rails, greasing the wheels of impeachment. Yeah, baby, yeah!

  • wily wascal Post author

    Biggest Loser mendacity races to over 10,000 lies, rapidly accelerating, dignity and integrity of Oval Office left in the dust to rot, any remaining credibility completely shot. New Orwellian the Republican state of the Union! Unreal!

  • Heather Mefford Post author

    It is TIME to disbar Barr and impeach Trump. They refuse to follow the rule of law and show NOTHING but contempt toward our Constitution!

  • jennifer rader Post author

    If he adds it to the census… we the people simply write in bold ink across the question “UNCONSTITUTIONAL”

  • Jame Franco Post author

    Oh,I am sure We won, now. Exactly like the 200x before. This is just the preliminary. I hope you have 4 or 5 back up plans. I know you have realized that by now.Always be prepared for Trumps move.1st you gotta know what it is?Simple, what is the Next step, then the next.What is the Ultimat thing he can do?Plan for that

  • TheMaryam1891 Post author

    Trump always has a plan. But he will tell you about it in 2 weeks. LOL

  • TheMaryam1891 Post author

    Isn't a tool for fear. Won't he then plan to send ICE w census workers.

  • Settings Showroom Post author

    Haha lawless hacks

  • Calkids Bradley Post author

    Dale Ho rocks!

  • Linda Brooks Post author

    TRUMP is working hard to get it easy-to-use for Russia to interfere the 2020 election.

  • altitude illume Post author

    #BEWAREAMERICA => #2russiaSCJustices => #PREJUDGEDBLASSEYford, dammit.
    #KAVENAUGHRAPES UN-investigated by #FRAUDTRUMP-severely restricted FBI "INVESTIGATION." #PREJUDGEgraham #PRJUDGEgrassley #PREJUDGEburr

  • altitude illume Post author

    REMEMBER #victimBLASSEYFORD #PREJUDGED by frantic screaming graham+ republican's FOR SUPREME COURT DOMINATION: #DANGER.
    do not be lulled. #BLUEWAVE

  • PHRESH Mankilla Post author

    Ha ha ha

  • ZARTHALAS Post author

    They just don't care bc Trump can just pardon whomever get's into legal trouble. It's a perfect loop of corruption.

  • Lisa Skaggs Post author

    This admenastration thinks they are above the law, you know like Trump said "why do we need Judges" what he's really saying is why do we need a rule of law when we have him? He can just decide what's wrong and what's right and he'll let us know daly on Twitter!!! Makes me sick but you know what makes me as sick "Nancy Pelosi" She needs to step down and let someone that's going to stand up and fight take over!!! Pelosi needs to grab a drink get a facial and call it a day!!!

  • The Blade Post author

    Two supreme court appointments and now Donald shows his real disdain for the law in general and the highest court in the land.

  • LEAD Club Post author

    Trump always has a fabulous secret plan ( bluff ) that nobody ever hears

  • Allen Yeong Post author

    The request to change is because Republicans lost the mid-term election, the present system were implimented for years, why need to change, it also shows they are worried about 2020, whether you are citizen or not is imaterial as long as you pay taxses, that is the way of lives in America

  • Randolph Benoit Post author

    fire BARR!

  • Cleartry Clark Post author

    I wouldn't be surprised if the president put that question on anyway and printed the census anyway because he thinks he's above the law

  • Gal Emit Post author

    Trump finally tells a truth! This just showed up At the real Donald Trump twitter account. “Our company has grown, since Trump has taken control of the White House & the Presidency, in the sense that we have better opportunities now to do what we’ve been wanting to do for quite some time, and that is to create manufacturing jobs. I believe that President Trump has…..
    6:44 AM · Jul 10, 2019 · Twitter for iPhone

  • Jonathon Freeman Post author

    Dictators do not obey the laws, they break them.

  • Roy Gonzalez Post author

    I can do whatever I want to do , Dam those Dates , Dam those Rules , Dam the Reasons , Dam the Constitution Dam the SCOTUS , Dam the Law , Dam the Torpedoes , I can do whatever I want to do " I'm the Fu*☆ing PRESIDENT " ! ! ! , BUT . . . dunt , dunt , dunt Another One Bites the Dust , dunt dunt dunt ,and another one gone , another gone one , another one bites the dust
    QUOTE : Richard Nixon

  • JSAIRU Post author

    trump is lord farquaad king of banana republic a.k.a. usa. smfh in shame

  • chris d Post author

    how does trump have any support whatsoever at this point, he, his family and his entire administration are worthless, unethical, morons. Ivanka? at the G20? Like a mule with a spinning wheel………..

  • Lenny Velez Post author

    this administration spend so much $$$$$$$$ ..trump will bring usa economy down with so much $$ spending

  • Steve Preston Post author

    Low I.Q Trump not a fan 😁

  • Tony RG Post author

    The explanation (the truth) by Trump's DOJ crooks to add the citizenship questions is YOUR HONOR, WE'RE A BUNCH OF RACISTS AND WE WANT TO KNOW IF BLACK OR BROWN PEOPLE ARE IN AMERICA LEGALLY.

  • M Infanger Post author

    FORCE BARR INTO IMPEACHMENT. HE'S A TRAITOR TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. REMOVE BARR FROM OFFICE. NO AMERICAN SHOULD VOTE FOR ANY REPUBLICAN RUNNING FOR OFFICE. THEY ARE ALL COWARDS AND TRAITORS AND SHOULD BE PUNISHED. GOP ARE CORRUPT, GREEDY AND COWARDS.

  • Tony RG Post author

    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE RAN BY TRUMP CROOKS LIKE WILLIAM BARR. THE IRONY. A DEPARTMENT THAT GOES AFTER CRIMINALS.

  • Freewheelin' Franklin Post author

    Open defiance of a Supreme Court ruling. A Trump stacked Supreme court ruling. Go ahead Trumpers, try to defend that. Any attempt to defend that demonstrates you're unqualified to even be in the conversation. Which, it's not like we still need to verify that.

  • N S Post author

    Deport Melania Trump with her parents back to Slovenia, and put Barron Trump in a cage at the border concentration camps.

  • Lisa Jenkins Post author

    Giggles. Sorry Trump, not

  • Artaher Duron Post author

    I'll say I'm not seeing the issue really, if you're not a citizen you shouldn't have a right to cast your voice on which way the nation you do not belong to should go.

  • Purple Flame Tarot Post author

    Hmm. Donald called the head of FBI "wrong" and now Barr says the SCOTUS is "wrong." Wonder if there's any connection there. Undermining the Constitution a little at a time, day by day.

  • David Edwards Post author

    So now will probably just ignore the court decision. That's what he usually does.
    This is just a plan to slow everything down, so he can just change the forms to what he wants.
    tRump has never been concerned or constrained by law. He just lies and cheats and constantly gets away with it.
    If I did a fraction of what he has done, I would be in prison. So why is tRump treated differently?

  • Daniel Schaeffer Post author

    I love it. The SCOTUS tells Trump to kindly go f— himself, and he refuses to get it. Let's hope this is the first of many such decisions. Good times ahead.

  • Johnny C Post author

    OMG, the judge called him illegitimate. Legal BURN! 😆🔥😆

  • Johnny C Post author

    Can someone please just jingle some keys in front of him, for the next 16 months???

  • Stan M Post author

    Trump to pass executive order to hire new team

  • Hildebeast Clinton Post author

    Admit the Clintons are on the flight manifest, boarding Epstein’s Lolita Express to the Bahamas. Admit it.

  • Tampa User Post author

    Just one more example of a lawless president and his toadies behaving like hoodlums. Sooner or later, all of those individuals who are helping him to achieve these immoral objectives will pay the price for their own lawlessness.
    They are guilty of betraying the public trust.

  • steve cook Post author

    Mr. BARR you say you THINK you may have a way to put the citizenship question in! Please Mr. Barr you are the top lawyer in the land. We don't want to hear what you think (A- Hole) Tell us what you KNOW! and tell the TRUTH ! About your DAD and DONALD's friend EBSTIAN were you at those parties at EBSTIAN's Did you have some little girls too? Bet you did a-hole!

  • Karel Haal Post author

    According to Trumpian law the Supreme Court is illegal to interfere in the census

  • Ricki Wright Post author

    No no!! He threw a Trumper-tantrum!!!!

  • Bubba Hogg-Buga Post author

    usa is one messed up shitstain

  • Ed Post author

    Come on now, let's say what he really wants. He wants to make sure to scare all of the brown people from being counted…done.

  • Dirk G Post author

    Trump and his team, so embarrassing… no shame whatsoever.

  • Quercus rubra Post author

    If they include that question on the census, I'm not responding to it and no one else should either.

  • Sal'tripin Guitar & Pedal Co. Post author

    sign the petition..https://t.co/Xgz8LUCPt9

  • Rick Roth Post author

    Are you a Citizen?   YES!!!   Why would the Truth now matter to the GOP?  Its called Alternative Truth!!!  Remember " The Biggest Crowd EVER?"   Remember " I'm going to Drain the Swamp?

  • Bob leroy Post author

    no one is above the law, even trump must follow US laws and obey our constitution or go back to what ever shithole country the trumps came from

  • Jewel Boynton Post author

    Good they going too far trying to make above the law normal

  • Paul Shaw Post author

    Trump is having a hissy fit because somebody told him NO! WHAT A BIG BABY!!!

  • Socrates Inglessis Post author

    Do you think they can still taste the spit in their food when eating at restaurants? Or has it become like salt, just another flavor?
    While some owners and some managers and staff may like the Trump movement and the rich getting richer again and again.
    I'm quite sure that more of the kitchen staff would be in opposition to them, something about working real hard and getting little pay.
    If you have never worked in a angry kitchen, do not go in and look. Just think positive thoughts and put a bit of salt on the food first.

  • Smileyrie James Post author

    Dump trying to put the question on the Census is unconstitutional not just illegal. Dump AGAIN attacking the Constitution he swore to uphold 🙄

  • redrock1963 Post author

    The "redistricting" of areas to prevent minorities from voting by REPUBLICANS is disgusting. And it stuns me that even after this has been shown to be true – via the email of the (now deceased) Republican "rezoning" strategist – that this is not persecuted by authorities followed by demonstrations in the streets.

  • Dallas Taylor Post author

    That ACLU guy looks so young he could be a character in Stranger Things

  • Bloodwolfz4 Post author

    Please stop these white men

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *