Judge Faith – Dodging Grandma; Horrible Neighbors (Season 1: Episode #6)

Judge Faith – Dodging Grandma; Horrible Neighbors (Season 1: Episode #6)

Articles, Blog , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 100 Comments


NARRATOR:Today on
Judge Faith…She says the grandmother
of her children
got her fired
and stole her car.
The reason why
I was terminated
was because Crystal lied,
talking trash
behind my back. NARRATOR:
But, then, this tale
takes a twisted turn.
She’s a schemestress,
a scam artist. (AUDIENCE LAUGHS) That is not
my signature. You can stick
with the story as long as you want to. That jig is up.
It’s over. NARRATOR:And later,how did these two go
from playful pooches,
to ferocious fighters?My dog had begun to…
I’m… Squirting blood
out of his head. He bit through the skull… That’s a lie. That’s a lie. That is a straight-up lie. Right.
You think that this is all
one big conspiracy against you
and your dog, right? (AUDIENCE LAUGHS) NARRATOR:Faith Jenkins.Her distinguished
legal career
began when she graduated first
in her law school class.
She quickly became a tough
New York City prosecutor,
and then,
a pre-eminent legal analyst
on cable news.
And now, she’s the judge
in her own courtroom.
Her cases are realand her rulings are final.She is Judge Faith.Plaintiff
Crystal Batiste says,
the mother
of her grandchildren
sold her a car,
and is now trying
to take it back.
She is suing
for money paid
toward the purchase
of the vehicle.
Joining her in court
is her daughter,
Tiffany Johnson.
But defendant
Tatia Remo says,
Crystal stole the car,and is counter-suing
for money she lost
while Crystal was
in possession
of the vehicle.
BAILIFF: Remain seated
and come to order. Court is now
in session. The Honorable
Judge Faith Jenkins
presiding. Your Honor,
this case isBatiste v. Remo.Thank you, Barbara. Okay, Crystal Batiste? Yes, ma’am. You are suing
the defendant, Tatia Remo, for $3,740. You said you paid that money
toward the purchase
of a vehicle and the defendant
changed her mind and took the vehicle back
from you. That’s correct, Your Honor. You are counter-suing, ma’am, for $3,540 for car rental fees,
car retrieval costs, changed locks
and a carnival cruise ticket. Yes. (AUDIENCE LAUGHS) We’ll start with you,
Ms. Batiste.
What happened here? How do you know
the defendant? I know the defendant…
She’s my grandkids’ mom. Okay. Okay? We had a pretty
good relationship,
Tatia and I, over the years, we’ve,
you know, bumped heads
a few times. But, overall, you know… (SCOFFS) We’ve managed to,
kind of, smooth out
our differences, and… And have a civil,
pretty good relationship. I began purchasing
a vehicle from Tatia,
a year ago. The Dodge Magnum. My husband and I
test-drove the vehicle. We decided
that we liked the car. I gave her the $450 down, we wrote up
a bill of sale, and we took the car. Me and Tatia
agreed on the payments of $175 on the third
and the seventeenth
of every month. I made the payments
timely, on time,
Your Honor, and I also took
a second job to make these payments
to Tatia. Okay.
Do you have a copy
of the bill of sale? Yes, ma’am, I do. May I see it, please? And, so, was that
the agreement about the car? TATIA: No. Crystal and I
never had any type
of agreement. Originally,
I let them borrow the car, because her husband
needed a way,
back and forth to work. However, when I… Okay, was there
and agreement that she would pay you? No, she didn’t… Only…
Only think I asked of them, is that they will pay
the insurance. So, she never paid you
a $175… Twice a month? My car note is not even
a $175. It’s $350 a month, Tatia. JUDGE FAITH:
Just answer the question. My car note
is not $350. JUDGE FAITH: Excuse me, ma’am. JUDGE FAITH: Excuse me. (JUDGE FAITH BANGS GAVEL) 19 payments of a $175,
you liar! Okay. (AUDIENCE MURMURS) TATIA: Judge Faith,
my car note… Is it your testimony? Is it your
testimony that
she never paid you… Make sure you address
your comments to the Judge. JUDGE FAITH: She said
she paid you 19 payments… (MURMURING) JUDGE FAITH:
…of a $175. No, she didn’t. She never paid you one single payment of a $175. TATIA:
No, I never asked her to. Because I never had no plans
on selling my car to Crystal. Oh, my God. So, no. JUDGE FAITH:
What is on the back of this? So, I’m looking at
the original…
You say it’s the bill of sale. CRYSTAL: That’s the original
bill of sale that was written up
at the time. Who’d write
the bill of sale on a note? JUDGE FAITH: Excuse me. Nobody. I did. JUDGE FAITH: Did you sign
a bill of sale? Because I knew I was dealing with a snake. Don’t talk to her.
Talk to the Judge. JUDGE FAITH: Did you sign
a bill of sale? No. Okay, take a look
at this document. BAILIFF: Stay there. Okay. I want you to look at
the signature… …on the bottom. CRYSTAL:
She’s familiar with it. She’s seen it before. Is it your testimony that that is not
your signature? That is not
my signature. Have you seen
this document before? I’ve seen it.
The police showed me… The police
showed this to me. This is not even
my handwriting. Is your testimony
that that’s a forged document? That is correct. That is not correct. What’s on the back
of this document, ma’am? (AUDIENCE LAUGHS) What’s on the back
of this bill of sale? On the back
of that bill of sale,
is scheduled payments that I made to Tatia. She and I
worked together. I helped her get a job
because she’s on probation for food-stamp fraud. TATIA: Okay. CRYSTAL: And stealing,
and shoplifting… (AUDIENCE WOOS) Whoa. CRYSTAL: …at Target. CRYSTAL: So, she cannot… Okay. CRYSTAL: Once she get a job,
she can’t keep it, because they find out
about her background. Sit down, okay? JUDGE FAITH: Is that true?
Excuse me. (TATIA YELLING) CRYSTAL: That’s what it is.
That’s what is. Excuse me. Excuse me. Is it true that you’re
on probation for fraud? TATIA: I… I…
No, I am on probation. But it is not
for fraud, however. I have proof, black and white,
where Crystal just got out
on probation. No, no, no, no, no.
I’m asking you a question. CRYSTAL: For whopping
somebody’s tail. TATIA: Yeah. (AUDIENCE LAUGHS) Yeah, you’re right. Mmm. So, if she’s…
I’m not… Yeah. I don’t need you ladies… TATIA: No, I’m not
on probation… TATIA: …for fraud. No. …dishing dirt
on who’s on probation. She is. JUDGE FAITH:
Let’s just stick… (AUDIENCE LAUGHS) Let’s just stick
to the case. Quiet. JUDGE FAITH:
What’s on the back
of this document? The original…
You say it’s the bill of sale. Yes, ma’am. JUDGE FAITH:
There are a lot of dates and initials. What…
What is this? Okay, the initials are me, giving her
a $175 in cash. She would initial,
and I would initial
the payments. ‘Cause we worked together. Who pays a car note cash? CRYSTAL: I did.
We worked together. Stop interrupting. TATIA: Okay. I’m sorry. Go ahead. CRYSTAL: We worked together. I’m a care-giver.
I take care of people. JUDGE FAITH: Okay. I’ve done it
for over 20 years. Okay, I helped her
get a job. She got the job.
She was doing fine
on the job. I said, “Tatia,
keep your mouth closed.” ‘Cause I know
she’d flip at the lip. She’s loved to talk.
She’s a schemestress. (AUDIENCE LAUGHS) A scam artist. This is where all of this
is stemming from. She got fired
off of the job. But, back to
the bill of sale… Okay, wait a second. The reason why
I was terminated, was because Crystal lied, talking trash
behind my back. However, when I got
terminated from
the care-giver’s position, the boss offered me
a position in his office. JUDGE FAITH:
Do you have any proof
that you gave her a $175 in payments? I do. I have a… JUDGE FAITH: Let me see it. Because someone, clearly,
is not telling the truth here. NARRATOR:Coming up…Judge Faith busts
one of these stories
in a truth test.
I don’t tolerate people
who come into my courtroom, and try to lie,
and deceive,
and manipulate me. So, I actually asked
a handwriting expert to examine the documents
and come into court, and testify today. NARRATOR:And later…Judge Faith must decide,
who let the dogs out.
I started screaming, “Please get your dog.
Please help me.
Please get your dog.” What were you
witnessing at the time? That their dog had,
had a grip
on my dog’s face, and wasn’t letting go. Ms. Darling, according to
the property owner, you told Mr. Thomas that you accidentally
left the gate
open that day. NARRATOR:Plaintiff
Crystal Batiste says,
the mother of
her grandchildren
sold her a car
and is now trying
to take it back.
She is suing
for money paid
towards the purchase
of the vehicle.
Defendant Tatia Remo
is counter-suing
for the money she lost
while the plaintiff was
in possession of the vehicle.
I am not
a handwriting expert. So, I cannot
look at this document and make
a determination that this is, indeed,
your signature. So, I actually asked
a handwriting expert to examine the documents
and come in the court
and testify today. So I’d like to bring out
Beth Chrisman. She is a forensic
document examiner. She has eight years
of experience. She has testified, and been
qualified as an expert in court over 35 times. She has helped solve
650 cases and examined
over 13,000 documents. So let’s pull up
the bill of sale. Did you have
an opportunity
to view this document before you came in
to court today? I did. Okay. Okay. You can approach
the screen, if you want. JUDGE FAITH:
Describe for the court what’s on the left
and what’s on
the right hand side. So this document
is the bill of sale,
that’s in question. And this center signature
is the one in question. These are samples
of known signatures that were used
in comparison. We have additional samples
of known signatures as well. So we have
a date range of 2011 all the way through,
I believe, this year, 2014, of known signature samples. From the defendant,
Tatia Remo? BETH: Correct. JUDGE FAITH:
And based on your analysis of these known signatures
of the defendant that you viewed,
did you come up
with a conclusion? The conclusion is that this signature
of Tatia’s does fall within
the range of variation of the known signatures, and is an
authentic signature, and was written
by Tatia. So you did sign
the bill of sale? CRYSTAL: Yes, she did. TATIA: I didn’t sign… TATIA: …the bill of sale. Yes, you did. (AUDIENCE LAUGHING) Yes, you did. TATIA: Okay. (AUDIENCE CLAPPING) Boo-yeah. It don’t matter.
I got my car, boo! CRYSTAL: Yeah, you sure did.
You stole it. So, it don’t matter… …what you say. Ladies, stop. Stop. It’s mine! I made
the payments. You don’t even know
what the payments are! All right, quiet. Who’s your witness, ma’am? CRYSTAL: My daughter,
Tiffany Johnson. Hi. how are you? Step up
to the lectern, please. TIFFANY: Hi. Fine. JUDGE FAITH:
What do you have to
add about this case? Um… Just that it’s unfair… JUDGE FAITH: Can you
speak up for me? …and it’s not right. And Tatia knows
that my mom was buying
this car from her. How do you know? I know, because I…
I’ve witnessed them
in-hand cash payments. And I’ve witnessed one time,
one Saturday morning, we put $175
into her account,
for the car note. So, you’ve witnessed
your mom pay a $175
to the defendant on multiple occasions? Yes, ma’am.
And it is just
what’s fair. You know,
we’re supposed to be family. And, you know,
have a good relationship. But, that’s not what
family do to each other. Thank you. What’s your
counter-claim about? The repo fee
that I have, um… Repoing a car
that you sold to her? But, I didn’t sell
the car to her. Yes, she did! I submitted the document.
Every… Every payment… Listen, you can stick
with the story… TATIA: Okay. …as long as
you want to. That jig is up. It’s over. CRYSTAL: Thank you. You sold the car to her. (AUDIENCE CLAPPING) The bill of sale
is authentic. It is an authentic
bill of sale. So, what else
is your counter-claim about? She owed me because
I took her daughter with my…
Along with my children,
and her son, on a carnival cruise. She agreed to pay me
the $500 back. I have a… She paid me a $150. Okay, your counter-claim
is dismissed. TATIA: Okay. (CRYSTAL LAUGHING) Because you
came to court, and you lied to me,
to my face. Your counter-claim
is dismissed. Okay. And I paid you in full
for Tiffany’s Cruise. I still have my car. You can have
that jalopy. Okay, thank you. JUDGE FAITH: No,
you have to understand.
I don’t tolerate… Excuse me. (BANGS GAVEL) CRYSTAL: You witch. TATIA: I’ll bitch if I want. JUDGE FAITH:
I don’t tolerate people who come into
my courtroom, and try to lie,
and deceive
and manipulate me. Okay. But, everything I have
is in black and white. That’s what you did today. I’m… I’m fine with it.
I still have my car.
I’m good. You have to be fine.
That’s the decision.
That’s the ruling. You don’t have
a choice here. Okay. (AUDIENCE LAUGHS) (APPLAUSE) I’m actually,
you know what, you… You took the car back,
it was illegal, first of all,
unlawful for you to do that, but it perhaps
worked out for the best because now
you don’t have to have anything else
to do with this individual. We don’t anyway. You don’t have
to continue… I don’t wanna hear
another word from you. TATIA: Okay. Not another word. Okay. Are we done?
This… This… No, we’re not done. (FAINT CATCALL) BAILIFF: Stop talking. TATIA: Okay. You understand? Put the bracelets
on her. (GIGGLES) How much,
in payments, were you… Did you make
over the course of the time
you had the car? I made $3,775
in payments, and I made a $125 payments
in insurance for, at least, I don’t know,
eight or nine months, I… In good condition, the blue book value
of the car is $5,509. Now, you…
I understand you say that you paid
for the insurance on the car
while you were driving it? Well, you were driving it,
you were using it. So, I’m not gonna
reimburse you for insurance that you needed
during that time period. That’s understandable. JUDGE FAITH: However… You’re so happy
you have the car back, I am so glad,
because now you can
repay her the remainder
of the value of the car, $1,734,
judgment for the plaintiff, pay her the money. TATIA: Okay. Thank you. (AUDIENCE CLAPS) Thank you. Thank you. Okay. BAILIFF: Where have you kept
the documents? You and your daughter,
step out this way, please. NARRATOR:The plaintiff
Claire Lopacki claims
she witnessed her
neighbor’s dog
viciously attack her
sweet pit-bull Petey.
She’s suing for
veterinary bills.
But the co-defendants,Judy Darling and
Bruce Baer say
their friendly retriever Floydwas only defending
himself from an attack
by the plaintiff’s pit-bull.They’re counter-suing
for veterinary bills.
Okay, Claire Lopacki… Yes. You’re suing the defendants,
Bruce Baer and Judith Darling for $1,000. You say that their dog
attacked your dog and they should be responsible
for the vet bills? Correct. And defendants, you are
counter-suing for $280. You said that it was your dog
that was actually attacked and that the plaintiff
should be responsible for your vet bills. Yes. Okay. We’ll start with
you Miss Lopacki. Did you know the defendants
prior to this day? Yes. On a friendly basis, I think I saw Judith maybe
once but me and Bruce had a respected relationship.
Friendly when we
saw each other. JUDGE FAITH: Okay and do you
have a photo of the area? I do. I actually had um… JUDGE FAITH: Okay, so let’s
pull it up on the flat screen. Okay, you can approach
the flat screen… Yeah. …and just point to the area. So, I was coming from this area. From behind
this Toyota truck here and coming across the alley… This gate is where their, their property is, where
their dog is behind and their side-door
is right there. Okay, so, you were
in the alley with your dog? I would… I had yeah,
I had just entered the alley, just
turned on to the alley, our dumpsters are on this,
on this side, when I had noticed that on the same parallel the, uh, the gate to their…
The gate to their, um, closed in area and their door into their
house was left open. Before I had a time to like,
a chance to react their dog had ran out and instantly started
viciously attacking my dog. JUDGE FAITH: Was your
dog on a leash? No, he was not. Your Honor, no. And… JUDGE FAITH: Excuse me. …with 120… You didn’t see the… You didn’t see the
dogs fighting, correct? No, I did not. Okay, so I’d like to hear her version of what
she witnessed for herself. NARRATOR:Coming up…
One of these pet owners gets
put in the pound.It does not. Her dog was a bait, he was a pit-bull bait dog
and we were told, “Don’t come near my dog
’cause I don’t know how
Petey’s gonna react.” This is from the
property owner? He does not have
a dog in this fight and he’s saying that your dog has
caused problems in the past and that you have
been warned in the past. NARRATOR:Plaintiff,
Claire Lopacki says
her dog was viciously
attacked.
She’s suing for
veterinary bills.
Co-defendants Judy Darling
and Bruce Baer say
their dog was
defending himself.
They are countersuing
for veterinary bills.
What kind of dog do you have? Here. He’s a pit-bull mix that I’d rescued
five years ago. So… And what kind of
dog do you have? A mutt. Er… Retriever whatever. Okay. Go ahead. (AUDIENCE CHUCKLING) The dog, the dog was a lot…
At least twice the size of
Pete. So, when it had begun
to happen… That’s your dog, Pete? Yeah, my dog is Pete. To begin with,
their door was open so, I had began to scream, like my life was depending
on it, for help. I started screaming “Please get your dog.
Please help me.
Please get your dog.” What were you witnessing
at that time? That their dog had, had
a grip on my dogs face… Hmm-mmm. …and wasn’t letting go. A man down the alleyway had
come over with a bucket of
water. The most he could carry. And he had dumped it on their
dog’s head to get him off. Hmm-mmm. My dog had begun to… Squirting blood
out of his head (AUDIENCE GROANING) He bit through the skull… JUDGE FAITH: Hmm-mmm. …and through the back,
and so I had taken him… I… Honestly,
this is like my child. I was in a one track mind
to get him to the vet. Okay. So, I rushed him there. I don’t have the financial
abilities to just throw thousands
of dollars around. So, I had asked the vet if
there was a way for me to do something at home. He said I needed to have
emergency surgery done on his back, head,
and neck immediately. Okay. I’ll hear from
the defendant’s now. What… How does
your dog get out? I have no idea, Your Honor. Okay, that’s a problem. I do not know. Have you had problems
with your dog… BRUCE: Absolutely not. …attacking other dogs
or being involved in… No way. …fights before? No. What’s your defense as to
why you’re not responsible
for paying vet bills? This dog is a very
friendly dog. I have a letter here from
people that have come with
me to the doggy park. JUDGE FAITH: You’re
speaking of your dog? This dog does not attack. You’re dog doesn’t
attack people? BRUCE: No. It does not. Her dog was a bait…
He was a pit-bull bait dog, and we were told that
by one of the tenants. It’s… JUDY: To stay away
from this, my dog. “Don’t come near my dog
’cause I don’t know how
Petey’s gonna react.” Well, let’s look at the
photos of the injuries
to the plaintiff’s dog. Since your dog is so friendly
I’d like to see what the
injuries look like. Well, it was the defensive… CLAIRE: This is him… This is him taken less
than a month before
this has happened. JUDGE FAITH: Okay. CLAIRE:As you can see,
he’s a sweet dog.
(AUDIENCE GROANING) JUDGE FAITH:Oh, wow.CLAIRE: And now,
I also have a photo of the tubes that were
placed in his back and the gouges in his back from teeth. Okay, I saw those. BRUCE: Your Honor… He was defending himself. JUDGE FAITH: Hold on a second. I’d like to add something. How do you know he was
defending himself? Were you there? Because the pit-bull had his his leg… JUDGE FAITH: Oh, you know
the dog’s intentions? Did he tell you he
was defending himself? (AUDIENCE CHUCKLING) He had his head…
He had his leg and the dog said,
enough is enough then went for his head
and started shaking it. Oh, so you weren’t there,
so, how do you know all this? I can see the hole in his leg. JUDGE FAITH:This is
Floyd before. What
were his injuries?
Under here on a dog’s part, the whole thing is
ripped open. He had athree inch hole by
a two inch hole
that would… No skin
whatsoever. The vet
had to bandage it.
Just ripped his leg open.
And that’s why he
grabbed his head. JUDGE FAITH: It’s interesting,
because I’ve never seen… Usually when I have
these cases it’s always the pit-bull that
does the attacking and this
time it’s, it’s the other way around where the other dog, the pit-bull has the
significant injuries. Floyd is 100 pounds. CLAIRE: Uh, and I also,
I actually have paperwork saying this is not the first
time either. Their landlord,
their homeowner, um… JUDGE FAITH: Hold on.
Have you had… Have you been warned
by your landlord about your dog
and problems? He wants to raise the rent. Right, you think that this
is all one big conspiracy against you and
your dog right? BRUCE: No, no, no, Your Honor. NARRATOR:And now,
Judge Faith rules.
This is from the
property owner. He does not have
a dog in this fight. And he’s saying that your dog has
caused problems in the past and that you have
been warned in the past. That’s a lie. BRUCE: That is
a straight up lie. The only thing we’re hearing
after the fact of the fight of a previous event. JUDGE FAITH: This dog… My dog… And I know what she’s talking about… I’m gonna quote
him from this letter. “Your dog has no control “and follows no orders.” Floyd is very playful Ms. Darling, according to the property
owner you told Mr. Thomas that you
accidentally left the
gate open that day. Uh, we didn’t leave
the gate open… We did not intentionally… JUDGE FAITH: Your counterclaim
is dismissed. Judgment for the plaintiff.
You owe her $1,000 in vet bills. It’s
your responsibility to keep your dog in your yard especially when you know
it has vicious tendencies. People should not have to live
in fear in your neighborhood that your dog is going
to get out because you
have no control over it. Judgment for the plaintiff. (AUDIENCE CLAPPING)

100 thoughts on “Judge Faith – Dodging Grandma; Horrible Neighbors (Season 1: Episode #6)

  • OutOfSight OutOfMind Post author

    She needs to quit drawing her eyebrows on like that, but that girl needs a punch in the mouth to understand she ain't all that.

  • OutOfSight OutOfMind Post author

    Dear god, that poor baby! Oh, wow, she must have be losing her mind with him so injured.

  • Natosha Smith Post author

    The defendant in the first case is a disrespectful hood rat, judge Mathis would have threw her out quick, she has no home training

  • Mehrunissah93 Post author

    Re-watching — must be so awkward to testify against your mom.

  • Levi Pinkhasov Post author

    They both look so young I had to pause and think when she said my grandkids mom πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”

  • Levi Pinkhasov Post author

    8:04 Love the judge give the forensic examiner a quick up and down haha 😏

  • Levi Pinkhasov Post author

    Haha she said β€œI’ll bitch if I want!!”

    I need judge faith to start holding people in contempt. I swear.

  • SHÁE SHAKUR Post author

    the first lady was so rude!! ugh omg.

  • K v Post author

    The second case I'm glad the girl with petie because the dog should have been in the yard and you could tell that the older couple was lying from the start

  • darepow Post author

    That first defendant is a nasty, ugly piece of work. She'll end up in prison.

  • Nicole Wickham Post author

    #justiceforpete

  • Jordan Norman Post author

    I really hate her intro

  • Verbal Assassin Post author

    OMG SHET YOUR HIGH YELLA ASS UP I WANTED FAITH TO KICK HER OUT THE FIRST OUTBURST…

  • Nela Talalelei Post author

    I love me some papolo's. Black people & Hawaiians needs to become Cousins. My auntys is all tidahs like that first Aunty who went into court. Clapping hard & shit to prove her point. YAAAAAS πŸ˜‚β€οΈ

  • Bivens D Post author

    The older lady is just as ratchet as the younger lady. Ratchet as fuck actually

  • Tina B Post author

    The defendant in the 1st case is an ugly & bitter bitch!

  • Ladii Different Kind 91 Post author

    Understood the defendant is lying but the plaintiff is to fucking old to act like that. Old fucking nut case

  • _JiMMYBROOKSXO Post author

    first chick was a petty bitch. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

  • Ashley Rayvon Post author

    Liers

  • shydreamguy wantsaboyfriend Post author

    1st case I pity the defendant's children & the father of those children because Unless he gets full custody from her , they are stuck with that Bitch !

  • SLatten77 Post author

    Judge Faith has wonderful control on her emotions. I would've killed that lying bitch!!! OMG

  • niansillabffs Post author

    I don’t think she was fair to the guy in the second case

  • Angela Williams Post author

    I love this judge she really need to learn how to keep order in her Court

  • Kenmoni R Post author

    They Be looking to Happy when Judge Faith walk out πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

  • bonnita- marie decarvalho Post author

    In the second case a bait dog is not a fighting dog ,they use docile dogs so the fight ones can practice ,dumbass defendant's πŸ˜‘πŸ˜‘πŸ˜‘πŸ˜‘

  • Tei Matata Post author

    I'm sorry to say that but I think this Judge gets easily irritated and takes things too personal.

  • Lori Sally Post author

    Listening at 1.25 speed…sounds like everybody drank two red bulls before court πŸ˜‚

  • michael crandle Post author

    Rude ass defendant 😑😠

  • diamond Post author

    Friends, what is it that you are holding onto that will take you to hell? Hell is not a fairy tale, its a literal place. You don't want to go there! Psalms 9:17 "The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God."

  • Terri Green Post author

    Thank God she does not have to deal with her son's baby mama plus baby momma looks like a fraud she shouldn't have never bought a car from her all she has to do is just deal with her beautiful grandchildren

  • Cheshire Smile Post author

    Such a beautiful elegant & highly respectful Judge, she holds herself in such a high standard. A Truly remarkable role model for all young girls.

  • Cheshire Smile Post author

    Im sorry but if I was in court or anywhere defending my precious fur baby I would not be standing their grinning & smiling. She even said that dog was like her child, what sick twisted mom SMILES over such a horrific ordeal? Sure, she could be smiling because her fur baby is getting justice but it seems way off, at least timing wise.

  • Ericka Jones Post author

    Judge Faith is way too nice and tolerant! Judge Judy would have dismissed the 1st case quicker than a New York minuteπŸ—½. She would not stand for the plaintiff and defendant shouting out in her courtroom with their loud outbursts and talking over her! IMO…that's a sign of disrespect. JJ would also tell the ppl in the gallery: "HEY…QUIET!" them reacting to every-little-thing is annoying a hell! I πŸ–€ me some JJ. Ppl say she is rude, πŸ€”that's why I like her…she don't take no mess!

  • Inferno Post author

    Right ruling in first case but i still think plaintiff got a raw deal.

  • Mae Chronicles Post author

    The plaintiff looks older than the defendant β€œgrandma” I’m confused

  • april Post author

    damn even though i listen about the case but by looking at judge Faith i got zone out lol she's so beautiful πŸ™‚

  • Mariel N'cho Post author

    My beautiful judge 😍

  • Samuel s Glover Post author

    Y'all go to court for dog fights?? Un-fuckin-believable!! That buffoon Trump is right, y'all need to make America great again πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

  • pudding tang Post author

    Where my nigga jaun at??

  • Mizz KK Post author

    Finally the pitbull was not in the wrong!!! #ProudPitbullOwner

  • giselle joseph Post author

    Love judge faith real patience in these cases. The officer is ready to put her out

  • Daniel Posey Post author

    The judge sure is fine!!

  • Daniel Posey Post author

    This first case is a ghetto hot mess!!

  • Autumn E Post author

    I love watching this show, my new fav

  • Ally Cat Post author

    How is it a twist??? Any dog can attack another dog. Stop βœ‹πŸΌ adding to their untrue reputation. They were bred as nannies for children.

  • Ally Cat Post author

    I have no problem hitting a dog to protect my animal. That’s my fucking child. They should have taken better care of the situation. Pieces of fucking shit

  • ifo lahi Post author

    Lying dog got owned

  • Kirstyn Ashlee Post author

    Ahhh, I love seeing liars get caught and them acting a whole fool because they look so stupid and that makes them look even weirder/crazier.

  • Shatoya Ward Post author

    Why do the mother in law and the wife look they are the same age?

  • Do It Like The Bereans Post author

    1st case: Defendant was in trouble for food stamp fraud?? That's almost as low as you can go. Like, seriously? There are truly people out there who need them and she's more than capable of working to pay for her own food and she does that? Wow. Her arrogance and entitlement is baffling. She was speaking over the judge and having an I-don't-care attitude that just seems to prove the plaintiff's innocence more. I noticed the bailiff told her to have a seat instead of showing her the exit…wonder if she got in trouble?
    2nd Case: Proof that pitbulls have a bad rap when the truth is that any kind of dog can turn on a human or another animal. Look at how badly the co-defendants' mutt hurt that sweet pit. I knew of a small child that nearly died from being attacked by a corgi. A lot of it is the environment the dog is kept in and how you raise them, but there's always a chance that any dog can snap. Pit bulls have a bad rap because a lot of people get them and train them to fight which causes aggression. Makes me so angry.
    The co-defendants only provided one picture with a cone around the dog's head. That could have been a pic that was taken after some other procedure that the vet coned him for. There was no proof of a hole in their dog's leg from the pit. The pit bull had enough damage done that it was obvious the co-defendant's dog didn't attack in self defense. He just attacked. I'm glad the plaintiff's dog is okay.

  • N A Post author

    They both are annoying. They keep talking and yelling at each other.

  • puma lyn Post author

    πŸ˜πŸ’©πŸ©πŸ˜ The defendant is a low life human being! Disgusting!πŸ©πŸ’©

  • puma lyn Post author

    The 2nd defendants need to be on a leash too! πŸ˜πŸ˜†

  • Anthony Hogue Post author

    Case 2: they were trying to use the fact that her dog is a Pit and because their bad rep they think the judge is going to think the Pit did it. Fuck them

  • Qwerrtyuiop Post author

    Love u judge faith πŸ’―

  • Helen Ruth Thompson Post author

    πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Food stamp fraud AND another charge!?!?! Sh stole from Target! Those are fighting words… πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ I know for a FACT that’s her signature now… Lying behind.

    And Crystal said she sure did end up on probation for πŸ—£πŸ—£πŸ—£ WHOOPING SOMEONE’S TAIL!

  • Scorched Earth Post author

    Poor wee doggo, Pete had terrible, awful injuries. If the Pittie was vicious and attacking as the defense claims there would be massive injuries to the other dog. If a Pittie attacks there's very little that can stop them. They have been deliberately bred to be physically powerful and to have a bite strength that will rip your head off. That's why horrible people choose them as fighting dog and abuse them to make them vicious. If the Pittie was the aggressor the other dog would've had strips torn off him. That's not the case, Pete was the one with massive injuries, it's abundantly clear who the attackers was. It's obvious just how devastated Pete's Doggie Mum is over this. Just because one of the dogs in a fight is a Pittie doesn't automatically mean it was the Pittie who was the aggressor.

  • MrRaziel25 Post author

    the judge is so smart and beautiful <3

  • P Jay Post author

    This grandmother sounds like a man. They both need to grow up.

  • DesolateArt Post author

    Oh that poor pit bull! Goodness his head is a mess with injuries!

  • Kazuma DoubleIce Post author

    If this really is Faith who uploaded these episode's and not a fan I think it is even more funny how some of the video's are blocked here in Sweden and some has been taken down in this playlist XD

  • puma lyn Post author

    Your grand kids mum?! That means that your son WASN'T MARRIED to the defendant! She's a whore who goes around having babies to get child support money! She's LOWER THAN A WHORE! πŸ˜ πŸ˜πŸ’©πŸ©πŸ½πŸ˜²πŸ˜ Look at her!She's a bloody lying DIRTY BITCH! How dare she lie in court! I feel sorry for the children. Being brought up by this bitch! I hope that the father will take custody of the kids, IF HE'S A MAN!

  • puma lyn Post author

    The defendant is so bloody rude! I hope that the plaintiff will talk to her son to get custody of the kids before the bitch brings them up to be like her!πŸ˜ πŸ©πŸ’©πŸ˜πŸ½πŸ˜²πŸ˜±πŸ˜ 

  • sky williams Post author

    So is it always the defendant that loses?

  • Ashley Post author

    2nd case the girl should’ve sued for emotional damage as well. I understand how pets are like our children and I can’t even imagine having to watch my pet get attacked the way she did

  • Cecelia Bleeker Post author

    In my area,if a dog bites another human,pet etc.It's put down.

  • tleesmith781 Post author

    The audience wished they have popcorn🍿 & 🍡teas πŸ‘€πŸ‘€πŸ€£πŸ€£πŸ€£

  • imwaytoshort Post author

    In the 2nd case how can that couple claim it was self defence when the pitbull has loads of injuries. And they weren't even there to witness anything. Their dog obviously has control issues because of them yet they wanted to use pitbulls bad reputation and lie. Bad owners create bad dogs and pitbulls are just like any other breed.

  • Nychole Amor Post author

    Why didnt she give her the entire amount that she paid to the girl

  • matthew lee Post author

    Once again another good for nothin pit bull case. Smfh

  • Lavonne Soderlund Post author

    Food stamp fraud ?? Well of course shes lying now !!!

  • kapes kapes Post author

    Wow first defendant she is a piece of work!!

  • Mary Lou Post author

    Thank God that woman's son didn't marry this rude lady.

  • Jamie Stephens Post author

    people are so rude…

  • Jessie Lynch Post author

    Call her a witch Grandma you will regret it when she prevents you from seeing your Grandbaby

  • Amaya Oliveros Post author

    With the dog situation, well with any pet situation, I truly believe that the dog owners are to blame for their dogs behavior. I had to beautiful pitbulls who were the nicest dogs you will ever meet. The most that they would do is constantly lick your face because they are always so excited to see people especially those who are new to the dogs. And I do want to say that the pitbull she had was very very beautiful and the before and after pictures just left me in shock.

  • Katricia Isom Post author

    They're sureΒ trying to use that "PIT BULL" defense

  • kay22100 Post author

    I can't believe the first girl lied like that. Unbelievable

  • Amber Ashley Post author

    That dog one broke my heart. Pits get such a bad rep. I’m glad she got some restitution, I feel bad that both she and her dog had to go through that

  • Marilyn Willett Post author

    sick of plaintive banging her hands together, even though she was correct about the case.

  • Arlene S Post author

    I feel so sorry for that Pitbull!!!! Poor baby… :'(

  • Kelly Booth Post author

    Your fault if your dog is off leash

  • Nicola Davis Post author

    The two women, talking over the judge showing no respect. I would have dismissed both their cases.

  • Tom Sawyer Post author

    The first case the lady played herself by paying for someone car with no receipt and what you expect will happen especially family

  • Kelstooo Post author

    She dumb for acknowledging she signed it. She look petty

  • Irrelevant Being Post author

    2nd case: plaintiff breathes

    defendants: "No that is a straight up lie"

  • Irrelevant Being Post author

    first case: lady clapping her hands as hard as she can cause that's the closest thing she can get to beating up the defendant HAHA

  • Rachael Thomas Post author

    Tasha's eyes are too close together. She looks sneaky with her ugly ass

  • Hellveania Hell Post author

    Make your videos available in Oceania! It’s unfair that your latest videos aren’t able to be watched in AU and NZ!! I miss your videos since I’ve watched ALL your older videos from 3 years prior!!

  • gmshadowtraders Post author

    9:28 – Whoaa…. a black female named tiffany, with blonde ass weave, and a skanky hoe dress…. my goodness, this made my day!

  • Acosya2 Post author

    The son needed to be there. He lay with her and had a child so he needs to take leadership of the situation.

  • Gorgeous Lady Post author

    Many Black women are serving
    Long sentences because they
    Wanted to have the last Sassy
    Word!.

  • Danielle Williams Post author

    You can have that Julama πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚

  • Michele Johnson Post author

    Come in to court and swear to tell the truth, then lie through your teeth! Shame on you!

  • Neil Bassett Post author

    Guy at the end took no responsibility

  • Tavon Fenwick Post author

    Barbara has a much personality has a broken toothpick
    I hate when that sexy ass Juan isn’t on

  • V J Post author

    The most violent dog I've known was a border collie, which is a dog most people would never suspect of being violent. A over protective owner was the one who was hurt the most. But putting a dangerous dog 1st over your family especially young children is crazy. Saddest was the owner blamed everyone but the dog. It's the owners who need punishing.

  • Danny Danni Post author

    So are we just gonna not talk about the grandmas eyebrows?

  • Reesicup 0815 Post author

    That first defendant . . . wow. . . What a horrible person. No respect, no manners, no conscience. People like that are an embarrassment to the human race. πŸ€¦πŸΌβ€β™€οΈπŸ˜”

    Judge Faith needs to be more strict about people interrupting.

  • Gary Ciapa Post author

    Walfare bitch u need to be in jail

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *