Graham details bipartisan plan for new red flag laws

Graham details bipartisan plan for new red flag laws

Articles, Blog , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 0 Comments


♪ ♪>>Martha: IN THE WAKE OF ACTIVEX VETERANS, CONGRESS IS UNDER INCREASING ARCHER TO ACT , READ FAYE AGO LOGS ALL UNDER DISCUSSION ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE. CORY BOOKER AND 2020 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES IS A LETTER IS FAR FROM ENOUGH.>>YES THERE IMPORTANT BUT THEY’RE NOWHERE NEAR ENOUGH ON THE STOP THESE RISING LEVELS OF MASS SHOOTINGS. THEIR MARK IN PUBLIC SHOULD DEMAND MORE. FRANKLY, THINGS LIKE BACKGROUND CHECKS. THE FAILURE WERE NOT DOING THAT IS A FAILURE OF LEADERSHIP. IT WAS BEYOND TALKING ABOUT THIS MORE AND MORE, SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM GETTING INTRODUCED BIPARTISAN LEGISLATIN INTRODUCED BIPARTISAN LEGISLATIT INTRODUCED BIPARTISAN LEGISLATIO ENCOURAGE MORE STATES TO PASS THOSE RED FLAG LAWS. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE TONIGH TONIGHT. AS ALWAYS, QUESTION HERE IS IS THERE SUPPORT FOR IT. WE GO THROUGH THESE MOMENTS IN THIS COUNTRY AND EVERYONE IS DEVASTATED AND THE QUESTION IS WHAT CAN YOU DO YOU’RE WITH THE PRESIDENT OVER THE WEEKEND AND YOU HAVE A GOOD HANDLE ON YOUR FELLOW SENATOR. IT IS THERE A WEALTH OF PASS RED LIKE LAWS?>>AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL TO HELP LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AT THE HANDS OF DANGEROUS PEOPLE. THE PROPOSAL LINES I DEALT WITH REQUIRING DUE PROCESS AT THE STATE LEVEL SO THAT LOCAL POLICE OFFICERS CAN HIRE ALL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS TO ADVISE THEM ON WHAT CASES THEY WOULD TAKE TO A JUDGE. THE ONLY TIME YOU COULD HAVE A PROTECTED ORDER AND HEARING WITH THE JUDGE AND DUE PROCESS, BUT HAVE NEVER SEEN THE PROCESS LIST DETERMINED QUITE FRIENDLY. HE’S DETERMINED ABOUT TWO THINGS, TO MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE WHO ARE SUFFERING FROM MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AND DANGERS TO THEMSELVES AND OTHERS, BEFORE THEY USE THE GUN AND WE HANDS BACKGROUND CHECKS IN A WAY THAT MAKES COMMON SENSE. I THINK THERE’S BIPARTISAN SUPPORT FOR THIS, MY QUESTION FOR THE DECREMENTS, WILL BE WILLING TO WORK WITH US OR WILLING TO GO POST.>>Martha: THERE’S OBVIOUSLY BOTH IMPORTANCE, KIND OF TWO SEPARATE THINGS. IS THE LEGAL PUSHBACK TO THE RED FLAG PROPOSAL, ALSO FROM BOB BARR, THE FORMER MEMBER OF CONGRESS WHO SAYS IT VIOLATES THE 14TH — FOURTH AMENDMENTS, ALSO THE 14TH AMENDMENT FOR DUE PROCESS. HOW CAN YOU TAKE AWAY SOMEONE’S GUN ON THE GOOD SOLID HUNCH BY PSYCHIATRISTS AND THAT THEY MIGHT DO SOMETHING TERRIBLE WITH THAT?>>I THINK THEY’RE BOTH DEAD WRONG, QUITE FRANKLY. THEY’RE BOTH LIBERTARIANS, THEY DO BELIEVE THAT YOU CAN PUT SOME OF THE IN JAIL WHO IS A MEMBER OF AL QAEDA. THE FBI HOTLINE TIP THAT’S ARE ABOUT READY TO GO TO SCHOOL AND CHEW PEOPLE UP, SOCIAL MEDIA POSTINGS, THERE ARE PLENTY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS EVERY DAY IN AMERICA WERE SOMEBODY IS ADJUDGED TO BE A DANGER TO THEMSELVES AND EVERY BODY ELSE. SELECT PROCESS IS APPLIED TO GUN OWNERSHIP. NOBODY HAS TO LOSE THEIR GUN UNLESS THEY HAD THEIR DAY IN COURT WERE NOT GOING TO CREATE A SITUATION THE COPS SIT ON THE SIDELINES AND WATCH SOMEBODY BLOW UP WHEN THERE ARE PLENTY OF WARNING SIGNS. THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS NOT A SUICIDE PACT, SO WHEN THE JUDICIAL HEARINGS ALL OVER AMERICA EVERY DAY DEALING WITH PEOPLE WHO BECOME A DANGER TO THEMSELVES AND OTHERS, THIS IS JUST AN EXTENSION OF THAT CONCEPT.>>Martha: YOU THINK THE PRESIDENT WOULD SIGN THIS BILL?>>I THINK THE PRESIDENT IS DETERMINED TO DO SOMETHING TO EMPOWER COPS TO KEEP GUNS OUT OF THE HANDS OF DANGEROUS PEOPLE. IF YOU HAVE A RATE LIST AND A KILL LIST, AND THEY SHUT DOWN THE WHOLE SCHOOL BECAUSE HER NUTS.>>THEY GO TO YOUR HOUSE, YOU KNOCK AT THE DOOR, WERE QUITE THE SEARCH — IN A PRACTICAL MATTER HOW DOES IT WORK?>>YOU GOT TO GET A WORD FROM A JUDGE, UNTIL THE JUDGMENT SAYS THERE’S AN IMMEDIATE LIST YOU HAVE TO CONVINCE A JUDGE THAT THERE IS AN IMMINENT THREAT OF BODILY HARM BEFORE YOU CAN ACT. WITHIN SEVEN DAYS, YOU HAVE A FULL-BLOWN HEARING WE HAVE TO PROVE WITH CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE PERSON IS A DANGER TO THEMSELVES OR OTHERS. WE HAVE HEARING ALL OVER AMERIC AMERICA, WITH PEOPLE BEING A DANGER TO THEMSELVES AND OTHERS, AND GET THEM HELP. DON’T SCREW ON THE N, AND JUDGE TOLD NAPOLITANO, THAT’S WHAT THEY SAY. IF CAN IT PASS? IT COULD PASS THE SENATE?>>THERE 1718 STATES WITH THESE LAWS. SO, I WOULD JUST TELL JUDGE NAPOLITANO THAT THERE’S RINGS EVERY DAY WHO CAN BE ADJUDICATED TO BE A DANGER. IT HAPPENS EVERY DAY. HERE’S THE QUESTION, WE HAVE TO SIT ON THE SIDELINE AND WATCH PEOPLE BE SLAUGHTERED OR WE KNOW THAT THIS PERSON IS ABOUT TO BLOW?>>Martha: EVERYBODY IN THIS COUNTRY DOESN’T WANT TO WATCH WHAT WE HAVE BEEN LESS WEEKEND AND EVERYBODY WILL WANT TO DO SOMETHING. I THINK THERE’S A LOT A MOMENTUM FOR THAT, AND WERE GOING TO BE WATCHING VERY CLOSELY TO SEE IF YOU CAN GET IT ACROSS THE FINISH LINE. ONE LAST THOUGHT, YOU KNOW, INCREASING ACTIVITY BY THE TALIBAN. ISIS APPEARS TO BE REEMERGING, YOU’RE WITH THE PRESIDENT, HE SAID QUITE CLEARLY THAT HE WANTS TO PULL BASICALLY OUT OF AFGHANISTAN, LEAVE SOME SORT OF POLICE FORCE THERE. DID YOU CONVINCE HIM OTHERWISE THIS WEEKEND?>>HERE’S WHAT I WOULD ASK HIM TO DO, UNLIKE PRESIDENT OBAMA TO ENDORSE, LISTENED TO GENERAL, LISTEN TO YOUR NATIONAL SECURITY EXPERTS. IF WE LEAVE AFGHANISTAN WITHOUT A COUNTERTERRORISM FORCE, WITHOUT INTELLIGENCE GATHERED, ISIS WILL REEMERGE, AL QAEDA WILL COME BACK, THEY WILL OCCUPY SAFE HAVENS AND AFGHANISTAN. IT WILL HIT THE HOMELAND, THEY WILL COME AFTER US, ALL OVER THE WORLD, AND TO PREVENT THAT WE NEED A MEANINGFUL COUNTERTERRORISM FORCE THAT WILL BE NO GOOD DEAL TO END THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN IF YOU DON’T DEAL WITH ISIS AND AL QAEDA. WE NEED A CONTINUING U.S. PRESENCE, THEY’RE NOT POLICE MEN, THEY’RE PROTECTING OUR HOMELAND, WE HAD AMERICAN TROOPS ON THE GROUND, THERE’D BE NO 9/11. THE AFGHAN PEOPLE REJECTED THE TALIBAN, BUT WE HOPE WE CAN GET TO THE TALIBAN HONORABLY THAT WOMEN DON’T GET PAID LESS, WE CAN END THIS WAR . YOU DON’T WANT TO GET AL QAEDA, THEY DON’T WANT PEACE, THEY HAVE A CENTRAL FORCE LET SPACE BAR US, LET’S DO WHAT OBAMA DID IN IRAQ>>Martha: WE COULD WHEN AFGHANISTAN AND TWO, THREE, FOUR DAYS. BUT I’M NOT LOOKING TO KILL 10 MILLION PEOPLE.>>EVERY SOLDIER THAT’S DYING IN AFGHANISTAN ARE, THIS IS WHERE 9/11 ORIGINATED, AND ORIGINATED IN AFGHANISTAN. LET’S DON’T REPEAT THIS MISTAKE TWICE. GOOD NEWS, WE CAN PROTECT AMERICA AND OUR INTERESTS WITH A VERY SMALL FORCE COMPARED TO WHAT WAS HAD IN THE PAST.>>Martha: UNFORTUNATELY, WERE STILL LOSING SERVICEMEN THERE. WE WILL SEE WHERE THE NEXT UP GOES.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *