DNC Lawyer: Party Didn’t Have To Be Impartial In Sanders Clinton Primary

DNC Lawyer: Party Didn’t Have To Be Impartial In Sanders Clinton Primary

Articles, Blog , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 100 Comments


BACK SINCE FALL OF LAST YEAR
WE’VE BEEN FOLLOWING THE ONGOING ACTIVITIES OF A CLASS-ACTION
LAWSUIT AGAINST THE DNC BY A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO SUPPORTED
BERNIE SANDERS, DONATED MONEY TO BERNIE SANDERS, AND FEEL THAT
THEY WERE, IN EFFECT, DEFRAUDED. BECAUSE THEY GAVE THAT MONEY TO
BERNIE SANDERS FEELING THAT THERE WAS AN OPEN AND FREE AND
FAIR AND IMPARTIAL PRIMARY SYSTEM. THEY FEEL LIKE THE
REVELATIONS OF WHAT TOOK PLACE DURING THE PRIMARY SHOW THAT
THAT IS NOT THE CASE, AND THUS THEY GAVE MONEY UNDER FALSE
PRETENSES. THIS COURT CASE HAS BEEN ONGOING, AND THANKS TO TYT
POLITICS WE HAVE SOME ARGUMENTS BEING MADE BY A LAWYER FROM THE
DNC THAT ARE INTERESTING, AND WORDED IN A WAY THAT I WOULDN’T
HAVE GONE DOWN THIS DIRECTION. FIRST, THIS IS FROM BRAD SPIVA,
LAWYER FOR THE DNC –>>IT GOES BEYOND JUST THAT
GENERAL ARGUMENT. THERE IS AN EXAMPLE GIVEN –>>THE REFERENCE THERE TO
ENFORCING THE PARTY’S RULES IS BECAUSE THERE IS CONCERN THAT
THE DNC WASN’T ABIDING BY THE RULES TO BE IMPARTIAL IN THE
PRIMARY PROCESS. THIS COMES FROM THE DNC CHARTER –>>PEOPLE CITE
A NUMBER OF INSTANCES IN WHICH THE FORMER CHAIR OF THE DNC, DEBBIE
WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, WAS NOT IMPARTIAL OR EVENHANDED. WE CAN
DISAGREE ABOUT THE EXTENT OF WHICH THIS MATTERED, BUT THEY
WORKED TO ADVANTAGE ONE CANDIDATE, WHO SHALL GO UNNAMED,
OVER ANOTHER.>>I TURN TO MICHAEL BECAUSE I
THINK ALWAYS ON POLITICS YOU HAVE A VISION OF THE SITUATION. I DON’T KNOW — WE’VE TALKED BEFORE ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE
DNC IS A CABAL IN A SENSE, A LOT OF STUFF IS PREDECIDED, IN A WAY
THEY GET INTO A ROOM, MAYBE NOT LITERALLY, AND FIGURE OUT WHO
THE BEST CANDIDATE TO PUT FORWARD IS. THERE MAY BE NO SIN
IN THAT, BECAUSE THEY ARE TRYING TO TACTICALLY AGREE AS TO WHERE
THEY SHOULD APPLY THEIR STRATEGIES. BUT I TURN TO YOU
BECAUSE WHETHER OR NOT THIS IS AN ACTIONABLE THING, I THINK
IT’S CREATIVE.>>IF YOU ARE THE LAWYER FOR THE
DNC THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT YOU SAY. I DIDN’T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH
ANYTHING HE SAID UNTIL HE GOT TO THE IMPARTIALITY OF
DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, BECAUSE SHE CLEARLY WASN’T, AND
IF THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE BOUND TO BE THEN SHE WASN’T.>>I WOULDN’T HAVE SAID THE PART
ABOUT IF WE WANTED TO GO INTO A ROOM AND CHOOSE THE NOMINEE THAT
IS ALL RIGHT.>>THAT IS THEIR RIGHT, THE
REPUBLICANS DO THE SAME THING.>>I THINK THEY COULD, THE
DEMOCRATIC PARTY, LIKE EVERY PARTY, IS A PRIVATE
ORGANIZATION, BUT THEY SHOULD CHANGE THEIR CHARTER IF THEY
WANT TO GO IN THAT DIRECTION. I WOULD NOT PITCH MY ARGUMENT
THAT WAY.>>HE WAS BEING A LAWYER, SAYING
WE COULD EVEN MEET IN THE BACK OF A CAR SOMEWHERE
AND MAKE THIS DECISION. HE’S TRYING TO MAKE AN EXTREME.>>WHEN GEORGE HW BUSH WAS
RUNNING IN 88 AND 92, PAT BUCHANAN CHALLENGED HIM AN
IDIOT, REPUBLICANS BEHAVE THE SAME WAY. AND YOU DON’T WANT TO
ALWAYS COMPARE YOURSELF TO YOUR OPPONENT, BUT THE PARTY POLITICS
STUFF, THAT’S JUST GOING TO HAPPEN, MAYBE THEY SHOULD CHANGE
IT, BUT CLEARLY THIS IS A LAWYER TRYING TO FIND THE BEST WAY TO
WIN A CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT.>>WE HAVE TO ACKNOWLEDGE IT’S A
LAWYER, IT’S NOT AN ACTUAL MEMBER OF THE DNC. YOU CAN
DISAGREE WITH THEM BUT THAT’S WHAT HE’S SAYING. I THINK IT’S
CLEAR THAT IF YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE A CLAIMED IMPARTIALITY —
LOOK, EVERYONE IN POLITICS IS CONNECTED IN VARIOUS WAYS, BUT
CERTAIN PEOPLE BEING THE HEAD OF THE DNC DURING A PRIMARY SEEMS A
BAD IDEA WHEN THEY HAVE A CLEAR HISTORY WITH CERTAIN CANDIDATES. I WOULDN’T GO IN THAT DIRECTION AGAIN. NOW, IT IS FRUSTRATING —
I DON’T LIKE THE WAY THEY ARE PITCHING THIS, I THINK IT IS
SHORTSIGHTED, I DON’T KNOW THAT NECESSARILY THOSE TRYING TO GET
THE MONEY BACK HAVE MUCH OF A CASE BECAUSE DONATIONS ARE
DONATIONS, BUT I THINK THEY ARE DIGGING THE HOLE EVEN DEEPER
HERE. SOME PEOPLE HAVE GONE EVEN FURTHER AND SAYING THIS IS THE
DNC ADMITTING THEY RIGGED THE ELECTION, I DON’T KNOW HOW YOU
DERIVE THAT FROM THIS QUOTE, MAYBE IT FEELS GOOD TO SAY THAT,
BUT I THINK THIS IS A BAD DIRECTION TO GO IN. IT’S THE
LAWYER, IT’S NOT THEM, THEY AREN’T NECESSARILY IN CHARGE,
BUT THEY NEED TO AVOID THESE SORT OF THINGS IF THEY ARE GOING
TO REAFFIRM TO PEOPLE THAT THERE IS SOME POSSIBILITY FOR
POSITIVE CHANGE IN THE FUTURE.>>LET ME PLAY DEVIL’S ADVOCATE. THEY WOULD SAY THAT BY THIS CLASS ACTION WE ARE GOING TO
EXPOSE OR RE-EXPOSE OR ENTER INTO THE DISCUSSION ONCE AGAIN
THESE FLAWS IN THIS PARTY, AND THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT THE
PARTY POLITICAL SYSTEM IS FLAWED. AND THEY WOULD SAY THESE
FLAWS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. AND IF WE NEED TO ADDRESS THEM
IN THIS AWKWARD, UGLY WAY, WE WILL.>>IF YOU ARE GOING TO GIVE $100
TO BERNIE SANDERS AND YOU WANT HIM TO BE PRESIDENT AND THEN YOU
FIND OUT THAT HE ISN’T WHERE YOU ARE ON AN ISSUE, YOU CAN’T GO
AFTER HIM AND SAY I WANT MY MONEY BACK. IN A WAY YOU CAN,
SOMETIMES CAMPAIGNS GIVE MONEY BACK, BUT I FEEL LIKE THIS IS
ALL ABOUT THE LEGALESE. CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS ARE USUALLY
BROUGHT BY OPPORTUNISTIC LAWYERS AND IT’S PROBABLY A LAWYER
FIGHTING AGAINST AN OPPORTUNISTIC LAWYER.>>TYT POLITICS DID AN INTERVIEW
WITH THAT LAWYER, AND THE RHETORIC COMING OUT OF HIM IS
THAT THIS IS FUNDAMENTALLY ABOUT HOW YOU CONDUCT A DEMOCRACY, HOW
MUCH ABILITY PEOPLE HAVE TO GET THE CANDIDATE THEY WANT, I THINK
WE SHOULD BE CONCERNED WITH THAT. AS DONALD TRUMP SAYS,
THERE ARE A LOT OF ARCHAIC RULES, NOT JUST IN THE U.S.
GOVERNMENT BUT IN THE PARTIES, AND I THINK ALL OF THOSE
THEORETICALLY CAN BE LOOKED AT, AND IN SOME CASES, LIKE WITH
PARTIES — WE ARE NOT IN SMOKE-FILLED ROOMS ANYMORE, WE
HAVEN’T COME AS FAR FROM THAT AS WE SHOULD.

100 thoughts on “DNC Lawyer: Party Didn’t Have To Be Impartial In Sanders Clinton Primary

  • Kyle Poynter Post author

    wooooow. so…TYT is defending corporate democrats. TYT is establishment media.

  • Clay Rogers Post author

    So if you give a donation to help my dying baby girl that has baby cancer and I used that money to buy ass and alcohol and my baby girl was just a doll that didn't have cancer, you wouldn't have been defrauded. I used to like you and can't imagine why.

  • INF Flux Post author

    These were the worst people to have cover this. Michael shure shouldn't even be on the show at all. BS hillary suck up pos.

  • L Wilson Post author

    TYT has gone off the rails with this thing. You guys shouldn't be attacking H.A., Tim Black, Hard Bastard nor any of the real progressives out there, and Cenk coming back with that "How's the greater of two evils going for ya?" thing sounds so much like typical neoliberal pablum that it's turning my stomach. I think, with the exception of Jimmy Dore and Chariton, you guys have lost your way. I'll be unsubbing and sticking with the progressives who have a damn spine.

  • Kath Casey Post author

    You blew this one BIG time! Have unsubscribed and withdrawn any support for this channel. That you would defend the indefensible…? There are no words…

  • JC Hut Post author

    The commentary on the lawsuit was decent.But the term "devil's advocate" in reference to the plaintiffs and the way John Iadarola rolls his eyes and can't remember the name Jared Beck (the opportunistic lawyer guy?) is ticking lefties off.
    If TYT is going to keep doing Justice Democrats and Wolf Pac, then TYT should be in support of this lawsuit as well. As butt hurt as we all are, it doesn't mean there's no case there. There's a possibility to purge the dnc at all levels… let's do it.

  • Bearded Gamer Post author

    No longer am a fan of TYT……..cant believe you're defending the corruption in the DNC.

  • MDC TV Post author

    This video has officially been flagged! STILL waiting for a video of Cenk apologizing to H. A. Goodman, Tim Black and Nikko House for forcing Jordan Chariton to slander these credible reporters. I am still unsubscribed from this channel because of this. I loved The Young Turks for a long time, and to find out their selling out disappoints me to no end.

    Boycott TYT until they publicly apologize. We're waiting….

  • Path Evermore Post author

    can anyone time code the supposed "defending the DNC"? i have watched it twice and not found it.

  • jokeer14 Post author

    Sellouts

  • jokeer14 Post author

    THIS IS FAKE PROGRESSIVE NEWS

  • Amadeus Reviews Everything Post author

    wow… Defending the fraud… That's sad and disgusting… lost all respect for these 3 panelists…

  • Furious Psy-Op Post author

    FAKE PROGRESSIVE, TYT is the CNN of YouTube

  • Malik Basit Post author

    TYT has become compromised. why dont they allow the top comments to be revealed automatically like on there other videos?. maybe because the top comment is from one of the 3 people that started this class action lawsuit? Niko House? Guys i use to like TYT but now theyre using the same tactics the corporate media is using to manipulate our opinions and perceptions because they been sold out!

  • reachforacreech Post author

    tyt is democratic trojan horse.next election they will be telling everyone to purge there hatred and vote democrat and the whole fake democracy theater can continue on.

  • rnomistakes Post author

    "If you give Bernie Sanders $100 and he isn't where you are on a certain a issue you can't ask him for your money back"??? And this compares with the governing body of the Democratic party not running an impartial primary election? No one expects any politician will agree on every issue, but everyone expects their party to be ethical enough to allow their party members to participate in a fair election. If you paid to see a championship football game and there was evidence that NFL was trying to influence the outcome you shouldn't receive a refund?? Michael Shure sounds like Paul Ryan trying to defend Trumpcare right here… I don't believe even he buys his argument..

  • McFint69 Post author

    Why have a primary if they have already chosen their candidate. I donated to Bernie because I thought he could beat Hillary. If they had revealed that they picked Hillary, I wouldn't have donated. Instead they lied and said they were neutral. That's called fraud. I lost money and I want it back. Over $200 million went to Bernie's campaign right?? That's worthy of a fuckin lawsuit.

  • Urizen61 Post author

    I'm not a lawyer. I don't know if what the DNC did was legal or not. BUT IT WAS WRONG, and it SHOULD be illegal.

  • Nikki Post author

    "Remember, it's the lawyer, not the DNC saying this." John, lawyers literally speak for/represent their client! So, everything coming out of that lawyers mouth in court can and should be taken as the DNC saying it

  • Pat Rosado Post author

    Seriously? You have lost your minds!

  • Phoenix Clouden Post author

    Ok…I'm going to err on TYT's side on this one. They didn't say anything outlandish or unreasonable. They basically just explained the situation, and speculated both sides from a neutral perspective. This sounds like a bunch of people butthurt just because the panel didn't out and out claim the DNC was wrong. Of course they were wrong, but they're basically asking if anything will actually come of it. I don't think they had the full story yet because John said, he didn't think they had much of a case, but they do. That's the only thing I think was wrong. But also, y'all do understand that TYT is unique in the aspect that one commentator's statements do not reflect the statements of the entire organization? Right? I can't believe this segment is the whole reason for this backlash. Try not to be so emotional and reactionary next time. This was silly.

  • JeRzYG81 Post author

    Unsubscribed. tyt has lost their way.

  • Michael Coe Post author

    TYT shilling for Hillary & the corporate Democratic Party, I ised to respect TYT but not anymore they are no different than MSNBC

  • Whitfield Sealy Post author

    I told you these tyt people were straight Clinton shills all the way !!!!

  • Bill Perdue Post author

    This seems like you're carrying water for the corrupt democratic party. You're outrage is that the lawyers for the dnc highlighted that the people don't choose candidates and our votes don't count. Instead you should be outraged that our democracy is a sham. This is shameful

  • jamesdarnel Post author

    hahahahahahahahaahhaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHA OH MAN, OH MAN, OH MAN, OH MAN HAHAHAHAHAAHHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAH! THANKS GUYS lol apprecrciate you guys always willing to be a joke

  • Bwoy Tangana Post author

    Michael shure (hope I spelled it correctly) doesn't fit in this channel. great guy but too far out to even be a centered opinion

  • Andrew Zibuck Post author

    I lost respect for TYT commenters on this video. It's like you never saw a segment before.

  • Chris V Post author

    omg u 3 are some sad sad pieces of work

  • Bozo1360 Post author

    I am so deeply disappointed in TYT for their positions on this video.

    "Donations are just donations."? No, that is completely the wrong position.

    The political party I support will be ethical. Apparently that is not the Democratic Party. And the Democratic Party has apparently tainted TYT.

  • joe Vasquez Post author

    Dems are not inclusive period. They will pick your royalty and you just shut up. 3 idiots talk in circles.

  • Mike U. Post author

    TYT, you totally miss the point when you get bogged down in the legalese……this is about holding the corrupt accountable and speaking truth to power…..something it appears you guys have forgotten how to do.

  • Scott Foust Post author

    I'm glad for this lawsuit is happening. I don't want my money back. I want the DNC to be legally exposed as untrustworthy. They claimed to be impartial, they lied. The party should burn so that another can take it's place (hopefully more than one).

  • crozet isles Post author

    Why is anyone thumbing up this video? Is it just some lemming brain dead response?

  • Bryan Clark Post author

    "Fair and even-handed" is such arcane "legalese"! Are you for real? "Donations are donations"? That is a tautology that elides the basis for the case in precedent and in the DNC's own charter. But I guess that's just "legalese". Get a clue. Further, if this "organization" is so "private" I can't imagine why it would need my vote so badly. Maybe I'll go full-on Green – that would obviously be fine with this "private organization". And the panelists.

  • Mah Kost Post author

    The DNC is arguing in court that they have the right (if they wanted to) to decide the nominee in a closed smoke filled room? WTF! That's not democracy nor is it legal if they're taking donations by giving the impression that the DNC was neutral and fair. When corruption show this level of arrogance publicly, it is no longer corruption, it is tyranny. The Democratic party is irredeemable.

  • GSBA Post author

    You are pathetic, I will not be donating to TYT next year. Sad and pathetic

  • Stuart F. Andrews Post author

    Michael Shure is an establishment hack who couldn't cut it in the Corporate Media so why do you have him on this show?

  • Danny Drexel Post author

    These guys are trying to get a job on CNN

  • Danny Drexel Post author

    This is a new low for TYT. I can tolerate supporting Clinton verses Trump but this is just too much. Shame! Shame! Shame!

  • Patti Thompsett Post author

    i dont know if tyt "broke"this story, i was watching sane progressive last year begging the sanders campaign to investigate and niko had videos about what was going on in north carolina

  • Melinda Cimera Post author

    How did Michael and John manage to get this so wrong? Opportunistic lawyers? What's the point of supporting the Democratic party if they can change the rules on you when it suits them? What happens if they don't like the way the next Presidential primary campaign goes and they employ some new tactic to rig the rules?

    John, people are not trying to get their money back, they want their vote to count for something. They want a fair primary process. And if you don't agree, what sort of progressive are you?

    Don't get me wrong, I love that TYT provides a platform for discussion of progressive ideas and issues (I always tune in to hear what Jimmy Dore, Nomi Konst and usually John Iadarola have to say) but this discussion is so snide, it's embarrassing.

    And, just for the record, I don't know why Michael Shure is on this show. As long as I've been watching, I've never heard him say a critical thing about Hillary or corporate Democrats in general. If I wanted to hear opinions like his, I'd watch corporate media.

  • Bill Post author

    Just so everyone knows, Two host dont equal the next 10 that come on the show and for sure doesn't equate to the entire TYT Network. The all have minds of their own why cant you just stick to the ppl that made the comment and not include ppl that didnt say those things.

  • Gevian Dargan Post author

    I'll keep my money and vote for Jill Stein.

  • Gabrial Erismann Post author

    Refined, CNN-quality discussion here. Actually, CNN is better because they actually hire women and people of color for positions of serious political commentary.

  • paradiseheaven Post author

    Please #FireShure

  • Ara Blumenfeld Post author

    Michel Shure 'apologized' he said 'I'm not perfect'. That's a DNC and Hillary Clinton' style of an apology. I guess it makes sense since he is a big Clinton shill. John 'a donation is a donation' Iadarola, you should be proud budy

  • Patrick Mike Post author

    This is pretty shocking. To have Jordan helping spearhead the message from the lawyers to the main channel respond with such apologist cowardly remarks amazes me.

  • Ara Blumenfeld Post author

    These 3 biased hosts at the TYTMain Channel have an audience of 3 MILLION. On the other hand Jordan and Jimmy have a tiny audience in their channels. It does make a difference when you get the News out

  • Brian Hamilton Post author

    THESE THREE IDIOTS DON"T FUCKIN GET IT

  • Marta K. Post author

    wtf is this? 3 stooges?

  • Refrigegator Post author

    Wow, this whole video was garbage.

  • Jacob S Post author

    I'm so glad people are seeing you for the garbage propaganda outlet you truly are.

  • Jack Albrecht Post author

    Around 2:40 "There may be no sin" in the DNC getting together and deciding "what candidate they will put forward." WTF?! This just after John put up the DNC charter section where it is stated that the Chair and all those working for her/him must be impartial to all candidates running. The DNC doesn't "put forward" a candidate you idiot. They are supposed to be neutral arbiters for all candidates who are running. This is just stupid.

    Then John goes on to say "they could" choose their candidate, but then he thinks "they should change their charter if they want to go in that direction." HEY DUMBSHIT, that is the entire prosecution side of the case wrapped up right there. The charter says the DNC must be neutral, you've all three said in one way or another directly that the DNC and DWS wasn't neutral. Thus the case shouldn't be dismissed and should move on. Actually, if this were a show with functioning brains; you've already said that the plaintiffs are in the right, so now the question is only how much the damages should be.

    Michael Shure continues to bring up what Republicans do, which is completely irrelevant to the entire case.

  • Ignacio Post author

    Daaaaamn. "Donations are donations" Really?

  • Maxfield Stanton Post author

    Nice of you guys to once again reveal your true colors. This is the reason real progressives hate you.

  • branden burks Post author

    You all are idiots. Shame on TYT again. GROSS. Why don't you just become republicans? You've been hemorrhaging viewers respect for a year. This is why. When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.

  • Jean-Pierre Carriere Post author

    If this charter is effective, article 5 section 4 is the law. Now, why TYT is deviating the subject ? Hummm !!! I am so deeply disappointed in TYT, even if I am not concerned by the lawsuit.

  • ampoules1 Post author

    The DNC did everything it could during the primaries to undermine Bernie while claiming to be neutral and that's what Bernie supporters expected, NEUTRALITY. Why is TYT not pushing for a conviction here like they did with Trump university?

  • Tony Pace Post author

    You can tell all these people making these comments have never read campaign finance laws… All of this commentary is based on legal argument, not moral. Everyone under the sun understands that the DNC was maleficent. Is what they did illegal? I say yes based on my understanding of Contract Law, but campaign finance laws would disagree. It's just not as easy as you think.

  • DimensionZombie Post author

    H.A. GOODMAN = TRUTH

    TYT = BULLSHIT

  • Chris E Post author

    They broke the bylaws. This is important. Get behind it. Bernie voters were mislead. The lawyer for the Bernie Voters is not opportunist. He has balls. The balls nobody else had. We were run out of the election. That i a fact and that is why people like me are bitter and want to have justice Democrats take over. They will never ever win if you guys are acting so stupid and faction the voters. Cenk: Get a hold of Jordan. We love Jordan but it seems to be no purpose to have him baiting HA and Tim Black. This is ridiculous. All your stupid drama and egos are going to ruin our chance. Set you egos down and have Jordan apologize.

  • Lil Kim Post author

    Tyt: look guys, lets be realistic, I don't think they have a chance to win the lawsuit

    Idiots in comment section: you are obviously sell outs! cheering for the DNC because you don't want to believe something that is pretty much imposiblrr!

  • Jack Adams Post author

    All one has to do is Google this topic to see that corporate media (and TYT) are ignoring it, just like they ignored the Sanders campaign. Been following you since the MSNBC days Cenk and find this fact very disappointing. It's time for you to get back on the progressive bandwagon or you're going to lose many of your longtime supporters, myself included.

  • George H Post author

    The TYT commentators are making too many excuses for the DNC here. Sure, the DNC lawyer is going to make his best argument to win the case. But that is not done in a vacuum. The DNC lawyer's argument speaks to the main issues with the 2016 primary process: namely, the process itself is corrupt. While we knew that the superdelegate system was set up to favor the establishment, we did not have proof that the DNC chair was rigging the process until the email leaks. The DNC is still in a mess of hurt. Things will not get better unless the DNC starts agreeing to be legally bound by their own rules going forward. That is just the first step.

  • Stephanie Lybbert Post author

    Correct me if I'm wrong, TYT miss the issues, eg. can DNC be sued for damages for their fraudulent inducement of donations? (Answer, yes, see Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 217 (1962).) NOT whether DNC can be forced to be fair and evenhanded as they say they are.

    They seek DAMAGES not injunctive relief. #Asstalkes

  • Louis Brown Post author

    any new news re:lawsuit?

  • Northern Beaches Same day surf Post author

    Tyt screwed this up,

  • Thinkabout it Post author

    It seems that TYT is trying to change the Democratic Party from within, through Justice Democrats, while at the same time trying to protect the Democratic Party from being exposed as cheaters and losing elections as a result. Not sure this can be done. By exposing the fraud to the public in a court of law the DNC lawsuit is an excellent way of changing the  Democratic Party from within. TYT should support this lawsuit.

  • O P Post author

    Just goes to show why democrats are a lost party I had hope for the Justice Democrats but that is slipping fast and TYT is going to tell you what ever they can to get you to still vote Democrat. TYT is just one big long we suck but vote for us anyways sentence I'm glad people are discovering how full of shit they are go make some money off add revenue TYT while those like David Packman who doesn't even cuss in his videos make jack shit suck up to your google bosses TYT you'll be like FOX soon dont worry.

  • holly rochford Post author

    Not quite sure how this video got everyone up in arms.

  • Buzzing Bear Post author

    Everyone knows that you guys are a bunch of lying sell-outs.

  • neirad537 Post author

    Any video with Michael Sure is going to be garbage

  • aaronmoravek Post author

    YouTube corporation is happy with their investment in keeping these establishment personnel at the top. They must be enjoying their special favors by keeping their ad rev., And having their critics censored.

  • Lux Holm Post author

    Am I the only one who feels that they're cutting John off & changing the conversation intentionally?
    He's the only one actually attempting to understand this case without jumping the gun. A solo video of his expansion on the topic would be worth watching.
    It's worth looking into this case on your own, at least skimming the court report. There's a lot there and for some reason it's not really being covered in the media.

  • Deschutes Maple Post author

    These guys are idiots and got it all wrong. The main glaring thing that comes out of all this is that the primaries, as the DNC's own lawyer in this fraud case said verbatim, is that "we have no obligation to voters to hold impartial fair primary elections, we are a private corporation we can choose who we want in a back room". So if this is the case, why
    even bother to have a primary at all? It's just a show? Remember how Wasserman Schulz kept saying how fair, neutral she would be? That is fraudulent, she knowingly lied to voters and donors. So much for democracy, eh? If a private corporation is unapologetically in a US court of law saying we'll choose our man regardless of who was voted for, then you have NO democracy. This case is a lose-lose for the DNC: get the case dismissed with the argument that you have no obligation to voters to hold free and fair elections because you're a private corporation; or have to case proceed and the DNC possibly is found guilty of defrauding the plaintiffs–which in fact is what happened here, i.e. accepting donation money while publicly stating you will conduct an impartial and fair election–when evidence reveals they did the opposite. i.e. rigged the nomination for Clinton. That's fraud, plain and simple.

  • Dennis Avery Post author

    Complete sellouts. You would have to have your head up your ass not to see that the DNC rigged the election. The DNC lawyer clearly said they have a right to rig the election. I used to like TYT but you guys are now just part of the establishment. I am discontinuing my subscription to you. You suck you sellouts.

  • Brian Hamilton Post author

    DOUCHE BAGS

  • logos seed Post author

    FAKE NEWS PUSHING ALL BS NON-JOURNALISTS MSM PUNK LIARS!!!!!
    YALL GONNA HAVE -0 subs in like 5min. yall coughBullsh!tcough

  • Mary Post author

    what a total clusterf_ck of an episode! you guys are all over the place aimlessly taking sides on the issue without even announcing which 'they' you're defending.

  • IslandGirl 9152 Post author

    Oh and there's that little detail about people being MURDERED!!!!!

  • Alice Wonderland Post author

    Opportunistic lawyer, my ASS. The primary was rigged from the beginning so our donations to Sanders were in vain and you don't have to be a government entity to commit fraud. TYT – you're so lame.

  • Seán O'Nilbud Post author

    It's amazing how fucking mindlessly stupid Americans are. They have no idea how their own political system works. Political parties are private clubs with their own totally arbitrary rules which they can break if they like because it has NOTHING to do with the law.

  • Muslim Lover of Peace Man Post author

    what happened.? i thought TYT was at war with the DNC.? remember early in the election night when Cenk said " here comes Hillary" then moments later reality sunk in she lost the election and the whole TYT all of them turned on Im With Her and the DNC. i remember hearing "WE ARE AT WARRRRR WITH THE DNC" ..Cenk.

  • insightdeluxe2 Post author

    These dudes have zero clue.

  • Crispy Critter Post author

    The DNC mislead by "advertising" a democratic process. I now know my donation and vote for Bernie did not count. I want my money back. From now on I vote 3rd party.

  • Devious Critter Post author

    CUCKS. TAKING UP THE SHAFT FROM THE DNC. ENJOY.

  • Ben Gilkes Post author

    Shame on you for dancing around the topic and not getting to the point. You have lost your credibility by bowing down to the DNC and not calling out their morally wrong behaviour. Your motives are completely see through. I thought I was abl;e to trust TYT to tell the truth, apparently not.

  • Thoth ! Post author

    Well tyt, you didn't have much credibility left anyway. I hope you guys aren't faking the truth because it's your legal right to lie for profit too lol.

  • Nicole Volk Post author

    Oh, well, who cares about democracy.

  • Balls Mahoney Post author

    Wow. How is that "war against the Democratic party" going?

    You guys have lost whatever credibility you had.

  • Trevor R.N. Post author

    #FakeNews #TYTFakeNews #TYTNotProgressive

  • steve kahn Post author

    You suck. Frauds

  • Libertarian Jaguar Post author

    TYT has been sucking since Dave Rubin left.

  • Hobbesian Thinker Post author

    Cenk sucks DNC's dick and John licks its ass. Wow keep going asslickers and cocksuckers.

  • 8DOLE5354 Post author

    Stopped watching and unsubscribed.

  • chillwill120 Post author

    Donations are not donations when they are solicited under false pretenses, that's called Fraud.

  • John Palacios Post author

    So this is the infamous video of TYT that everybody hates…………. eh
    I agree more with John Iadarola, but he could have been tougher on the DNC.

  • Jeremy Chase Post author

    Ahh…another reminder of why I unsubscribed from this partisan shit show.

  • jwafer10 Post author

    TYT and other bogus liberals are the real problem, not Trump. Trump is a symptom of the damage that phony liberals have caused with their selective outrage and unwillingness to put morality over money. This video is just a lengthy example of them trying to sidestep the truth. Clearly TYT was being paid off to keep their audience from getting involved in this lawsuit which does have merit because the DNC leaders actually admitted to their wrongdoings to save their own hides from slam dunk lawsuits in civil court. With public outrage, Many corporate democrats could have been taken down either criminally or financially and just maybe this won't happen again. Instead, TYT gets bought off for a few thousand dollars, the lawsuit is swept under the rug, and voter suppression will happen again because no one got punished the last time. I hope Cenk and Ana are happy with themselves. They didn't even have the courage to do their own dirty work but instead had their lackeys do it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *