Dallas County judge hears requests regarding witnesses, evidence in Amber Guyger’s pre-trial hearing

Dallas County judge hears requests regarding witnesses, evidence in Amber Guyger’s pre-trial hearing

Articles, Blog , , , , , , , , 1 Comment


DOES DOES NODDING DOES NODDING INCLUDE DOES NODDING INCLUDE ANY DOES NODDING INCLUDE ANY POLICE DOES NODDING INCLUDE ANY POLICE
OFFICERS, DOES NODDING INCLUDE ANY POLICE
OFFICERS, MAYOR DOES NODDING INCLUDE ANY POLICE
OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON DOES NODDING INCLUDE ANY POLICE
OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
MORE OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
MORE WILL OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
MORE WILL BAPPOINTED. OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
>>> WILL BAPPOINTED. OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
>>>[email protected] BAPPOINTED. OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
>>>[email protected] [email protected] NTED. OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
>>>[email protected] [email protected] MURDER, OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
>>>[email protected] [email protected] MURDER, THE OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
LEAD @TAL [email protected] MURDER, THE OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
LEAD UP L [email protected] MURDER, THE OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
LEAD UP TO [email protected] MURDER, THE OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
LEAD UP TO H [email protected] MURDER, THE OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
LEAD UP TO H IAL URDER, THE OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
LEAD UP TO H IAL HAS R, THE OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
LEAD UP TO H IAL HAS BEEN E OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
CONSENT TO H IAL HAS BEEN E OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
CONSENT — H IAL HAS BEEN E OFFICERS, MAYOR JOHNSON SS
CONSENT — CONTENTIOUS. N E CONSENT — CONTENTIOUS. N E CONSENT — CONTENTIOUS. N E
THEY CONSENT — CONTENTIOUS. N E
THEY ARE CONSENT — CONTENTIOUS. N E
THEY ARE TNG CONSENT — CONTENTIOUS. N E
THEY ARE TNG U CONSENT — CONTENTIOUS. N E
THEY ARE TNG U A CONSENT — CONTENTIOUS. N E
THEY ARE TNG U A FIGHT THEY ARE TNG U A FIGHT THEY ARE TNG U A FIGHT
OVER THEY ARE TNG U A FIGHT
OVER WHO THEY ARE TNG U A FIGHT
OVER WHO WILL THEY ARE TNG U A FIGHT
OVER WHO WILL ST THEY ARE TNG U A FIGHT
OVER WHO WILL ST O THEY ARE TNG U A FIGHT
OVER WHO WILL ST O THE THEY ARE TNG U A FIGHT
OVER WHO WILL ST O THE JURY, OVER WHO WILL ST O THE JURY, OVER WHO WILL ST O THE JURY,
THAT OVER WHO WILL ST O THE JURY,
THAT WILL OVER WHO WILL ST O THE JURY,
THAT WILL DETERMINE OVER WHO WILL ST O THE JURY,
THAT WILL DETERMINE IF OVER WHO WILL ST O THE JURY,
THAT WILL DETERMINE IF GGER THAT WILL DETERMINE IF GGER THAT WILL DETERMINE IF GGER
[email protected] THAT WILL DETERMINE IF GGER
IS THAT WILL DETERMINE IF GGER
IS GUILTY. IS GUILTY. IS GUILTY.
HEARS IS GUILTY.
HEARS REBECCA IS GUILTY.
HEARS REBECCA LOPEZ. HEARS REBECCA LOPEZ. HEARS REBECCA LOPEZ.
>>HEARS REBECCA LOPEZ.
>>Reporter: HEARS REBECCA LOPEZ.
>>Reporter: HER HEARS REBECCA LOPEZ.
>>Reporter: HER TRIAL HEARS REBECCA LOPEZ.
>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
A>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
A MONTH>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
A MONTH AYIWILL>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
A MONTH AYIWILL HAVE>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
A MONTH AYIWILL HAVE A>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
HUGE TH AYIWILL HAVE A>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
HUGE NTNAL WILL HAVE A>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
HUGE NTNAL IEST, AVE A>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
HUGE NTNAL IEST, TT A>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
HUGE NTNAL IEST, TT IS>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
WHY NTNAL IEST, TT IS>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
WHY ROUTINE EST, TT IS>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
WHY ROUTINE TRIALS IS>>Reporter: HER TRIAL IOVE
WHY ROUTINE TRIALS WERE WHY ROUTINE TRIALS WERE WHY ROUTINE TRIALS WERE
PRETRIALS WHY ROUTINE TRIALS WERE
PRETRIALS LIKE WHY ROUTINE TRIALS WERE
PRETRIALS LIKE TODAY WHY ROUTINE TRIALS WERE
PRETRIALS LIKE TODAY GARNERED WHY ROUTINE TRIALS WERE
PRETRIALS LIKE TODAY GARNERED A PRETRIALS LIKE TODAY GARNERED A PRETRIALS LIKE TODAY GARNERED A
LOT PRETRIALS LIKE TODAY GARNERED A
LOT OF PRETRIALS LIKE TODAY GARNERED A
LOT OF MA PRETRIALS LIKE TODAY GARNERED A
LOT OF MA AENTION. PRETRIALS LIKE TODAY GARNERED A
LOT OF MA AENTION. [email protected] LOT OF MA AENTION. [email protected] LOT OF MA AENTION. [email protected]
SHE LOT OF MA AENTION. [email protected]
SHE APPEARED LOT OF MA AENTION. [email protected]
SHE APPEARED IN LOT OF MA AENTION. [email protected]
SHE APPEARED IN CRT LOT OF MA AENTION. [email protected]
SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH LOT OF MA AENTION. [email protected]
SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
LAWYERS, SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
LAWYERS, THE SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
LAWYERS, THE JY SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
LAWYERS, THE JY POOL SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
LAWYERS, THE JY POOL WBE SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
LARGE. , THE JY POOL WBE SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
THEY . , THE JY POOL WBE SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
THEY WILL HE JY POOL WBE SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
THEY WILL BE JY POOL WBE SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
THEY WILL BE SESTERED BE SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
THEY WILL BE SESTERED IN SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
THEY WILL BE SESTERED IN T SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
[email protected] L BE SESTERED IN T SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
[email protected] FOR SESTERED IN T SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
[email protected] FOR TDUTION D IN T SHE APPEARED IN CRT WITH HR
[email protected] FOR TDUTION OTHE T [email protected] FOR TDUTION OTHE T [email protected] FOR TDUTION OTHE T
TRIAL. TRIAL. TRIAL.
A TRIAL.
A H TRIAL.
A H PFILE TRIAL.
A H PFILE CASE TRIAL.
A H PFILE CASE LE TRIAL.
A H PFILE CASE LE THIS TRIAL.
CAN PFILE CASE LE THIS TRIAL.
CAN BE LE CASE LE THIS TRIAL.
CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
>>CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
>> THE CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
>> THE JE CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
>> THE JE DO CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
>> THE JE DO NOT CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
>> THE JE DO NOT WNT CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
PUT THE JE DO NOT WNT CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
PUT ANYTHING NOT WNT CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
PUT ANYTHING OUT WNT CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
PUT ANYTHING OUT ABOUT CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
PUT ANYTHING OUT ABOUT TOO CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
PUT ANYTHING OUT ABOUT TOO MUC CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
WILL NYTHING OUT ABOUT TOO MUC CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
WILL IT HING OUT ABOUT TOO MUC CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
WILL IT SWL OUT ABOUT TOO MUC CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
WILL IT SWL DO T ABOUT TOO MUC CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
WILL IT SWL DO WITH UT TOO MUC CAN BE LGTHY. LE THIS
WILL IT SWL DO WITH T TOO MUC WILL IT SWL DO WITH T TOO MUC WILL IT SWL DO WITH T TOO MUC
JURORS, WILL IT SWL DO WITH T TOO MUC
JURORS, PART WILL IT SWL DO WITH T TOO MUC
JURORS, PART SHOWING WILL IT SWL DO WITH T TOO MUC
JURORS, PART SHOWING UFOR JURORS, PART SHOWING UFOR JURORS, PART SHOWING UFOR
JURY JURORS, PART SHOWING UFOR
JURY SLTION. JURORS, PART SHOWING UFOR
>>Y SLTION. JURORS, PART SHOWING UFOR
>>Reporter: JURORS, PART SHOWING UFOR
>>Reporter: GUYGER’S JURORS, PART SHOWING UFOR
>>Reporter: GUYGER’S ATTORNEYS>>Reporter: GUYGER’S ATTORNEYS>>Reporter: GUYGER’S ATTORNEYS
WANT>>Reporter: GUYGER’S ATTORNEYS
WANT THEM>>Reporter: GUYGER’S ATTORNEYS
WANT THEM T>>Reporter: GUYGER’S ATTORNEYS
WANT THEM T ME>>Reporter: GUYGER’S ATTORNEYS
WANT THEM T ME OUT>>Reporter: GUYGER’S ATTORNEYS
WANT THEM T ME OUT O>>Reporter: GUYGER’S ATTORNEYS
WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
DALLAS WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
DALLAS AREA. WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
SHE AS AREA. WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
SHE SAYS EA. WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
SHE SAYS THERE WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
SHE SAYS THERE ISSO WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
SHE SAYS THERE ISSO MUCH WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
PRIVATE THERE ISSO MUCH WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
PRIVATE ADJUST ISSO MUCH WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
PRIVATE ADJUST IN O MUCH WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
PRIVATE ADJUST IN THE CH WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
PRIVATE ADJUST IN THE COUNITY WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
THAT TE ADJUST IN THE COUNITY WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
THAT THE DJUST IN THE COUNITY WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
THAT THE LIKLIHOOD HE COUNITY WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
THAT THE LIKLIHOOD OF COUNITY WANT THEM T ME OUT O THE
THAT THE LIKLIHOOD OF AFAIR Y THAT THE LIKLIHOOD OF AFAIR Y THAT THE LIKLIHOOD OF AFAIR Y
AND THAT THE LIKLIHOOD OF AFAIR Y
AND IMPARTIAL THAT THE LIKLIHOOD OF AFAIR Y
AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL THAT THE LIKLIHOOD OF AFAIR Y
AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL IS AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL IS AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL IS
UNLIKELY. UNLIKELY. UNLIKELY.
>>UNLIKELY.
>>WHEN UNLIKELY.
>>WHEN THEY UNLIKELY.
>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW UNLIKELY.
>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL UNLIKELY.
>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL THE>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL THE>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL THE
POTENTIAL>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL THE
POTENTIAL JURORS>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL THE
POTENTIAL JURORS AND>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL THE
POTENTIAL JURORS AND THE>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL THE
POTENTIAL JURORS AND THE PANEL,>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL THE
IF ENTIAL JURORS AND THE PANEL,>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL THE
IF THEY L JURORS AND THE PANEL,>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL THE
IF THEY CAN RORS AND THE PANEL,>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL THE
IF THEY CAN BE S AND THE PANEL,>>WHEN THEY INTERVIEW ALL THE
IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL, IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL, IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL,
Reporter: IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL,
Reporter: IF IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL,
Reporter: IF THEY IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL,
Reporter: IF THEY CANNOT IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL,
Reporter: IF THEY CANNOT FI IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL,
Reporter: IF THEY CANNOT FI A IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL,
FAIR ter: IF THEY CANNOT FI A IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL,
FAIR JURY, F THEY CANNOT FI A IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL,
FAIR JURY, THEY Y CANNOT FI A IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL,
FAIR JURY, THEY WILL NOT FI A IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL,
FAIR JURY, THEY WILL MOVE I A IF THEY CAN BE FAIR.>>E PANEL,
FAIR JURY, THEY WILL MOVE THE FAIR JURY, THEY WILL MOVE THE FAIR JURY, THEY WILL MOVE THE
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
INCLUDED [email protected]
INCLUDED ARE [email protected]
INCLUDED ARE BULLET [email protected]
INCLUDED ARE BULLET CASINGS [email protected]
INCLUDED ARE BULLET CASINGS AND [email protected]
PROJECTILES. BULLET CASINGS AND [email protected]
PROJECTILES. ULLET CASINGS AND PROJECTILES. ULLET CASINGS AND PROJECTILES. ULLET CASINGS AND
IF PROJECTILES. ULLET CASINGS AND
IF THE PROJECTILES. ULLET CASINGS AND
IF THE JUGE PROJECTILES. ULLET CASINGS AND
IF THE JUGE TS PROJECTILES. ULLET CASINGS AND
IF THE JUGE TS TO

One thought on “Dallas County judge hears requests regarding witnesses, evidence in Amber Guyger’s pre-trial hearing

  • Fly house of truth Post author

    Well you heard the story of Daniel Shaver
    And the sad end of Dillon Taylor
    But there's a legend in the stories of the news I guess
    A man named Botham from a Dallas TX

    Every apartment resident knows his name
    they swear he was sober and to believe her story is insane
    Heart of gold only spoke the truth
    he gonna go to glory in his prime and youth

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *