Court docs accuse Pete Rose of statutory rape in 1970s

Court docs accuse Pete Rose of statutory rape in 1970s

Articles, Blog , , 0 Comments


ANS TO REALLY QUESTION THEIR LOYALTY TO THE HIT KING.>>HERE WE GO, 6:08 ON 700 WLW, THIS IS SPORTSTALK, I’M LANCE MCALISTER. EMILY: INSIDE THE 700-WLW STUDIOS, LANCE MCALISTER WAS SCHEDULED TO TALK WITH PETE ROSE ABOUT THE PASSING OF LEE MAY. ONCE THESE COURT DOCUMENTS WERE RELEASED, CLAIMING ROSE ADMITTED TO HAVING A SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH A TEENAGE GIRL IN 1975, ROSE CANCELED THE INTERVIEW, NOT ONCE, BUT TWIC>>I HAVE NOT BEEN THIS UNCOMFORTABLE IN WHAT I DO SINCE 1989, THE DAY THAT PETE ROSE WAS BANNED FROM BASEBALL. EMILY: ACCORDING TO COURT DOCUMENTS, THE VICTIM, IDENTIFIED AS JANE DOE TESTIFIED UNDER OATH SHE HAD SEX WITH ROSE WHEN SHE WAS YOUNGER THAN 16. BUT ROSE DENIES SHE WAS UNDERAGE, CLAIMING SHE WAS 16. IN OHIO, THE AGE OF CONSENT IS 16>>HONESTLY IT MAKES ME FEEL DIRTY. I’M THE FATHER OF A 15-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER AND THE FATHER OF A 17-YEAR-OLD SON AND I GOT TO TELL YOU I WAS NOT LOOKING FORWARD TO ASKING PETE ROSE ABOUT SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH A 16-YEAR-OLD BECAUSE I NOT ONLY CAN’T IMAGINE IT, I CAN’T STOMACH IT. EMILY: RETIRED HAMILTON COUNTY JUDGE NORBERT NADEL, WHO RULED IN FAVOR OF ROSE IN ONE OF HIS 1989 CASES, SAYS WHILE THIS DOES NOT HELP ROSE’S REPUTATION, HE WONDERS WHY THIS IS ALL COMING OUT NO>>MY QUESTION IS, WHY DO YOU WAIT FOUR PLUS DECADES TO BRING SOMETHING OUT LIKE THIS? SO I WOULD QUESTION THE CREDIBILITY OF THE WHOLE THING.>>IF YOU ROLL BACK TIME A HUNDRED YEARS AGO, GIRLS WERE GETTING MARRIED AT THE AGE OF 13 AND 14.>>THERE’S REALLY PEOPLE TRYING TO DEFEND PETE ON THIS? I’M SPEECHLESS. AS MUCH AS I LOVE PETE, COME ON. I MEAN, I CANNOT DEFEND PETE ON THIS. EMIL THE JUDGE SAYS BECAUSE THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS HAS PASSED ON THESE ACCUSATIONS, ROSE COULD NOT FACE ANY CRIMINAL CHARGES.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *